Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T04BU01621
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/08/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | October 8, 2004 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering and Landscape Review Section and approval of the site plan. 2. Two copies of the approved site, landscape, and NPPO plan must be included with the grading plan. Include the LDO approval letter. |
| 10/12/2004 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 8, 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04BU01621 PROJECT NAME: Sahuaro Apartments PROJECT ADDRESS: 2350 North 6th Avenue PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert The following items must be revised or added to the grading plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: GRADING PLAN (Three copies) SWPPP APPROVED 1. A copy of the stamped approved Site Plan must be included with the Grading Plan submittal. 2. The Site Plan is currently in review. Any changes made to the Site Plan must be reflected on the Grading Plan. The Site Plan and Grading Plan must match. 3. For plan clarity label sheet X-8, Grading and Paving Plan 2 of 2. Add a general note to the paving and grading plan that all drainage information can be found on sheet 2 of the Paving and Grading Plan. Revise both plan sheets accordingly. The response letter stated that this comment was acknowledged and made the recommended change. However the changes were not made to sheet X-8. For plan clarity it is recommended to provide the above information. 4. The soils report must provide a recommended minimum a setback from the basin to the buildings (building 1) from a licensed civil engineer. Provide the report, show and dimension setbacks on the grading plan. SDRM 3.5.1.5. and SMDDFM 14.2.6. 5. Show grading limits on the plan. See IBC Chapter 36 Section 14 for recommended setbacks. The response for the above comment is not acceptable. Please note the language of Chapter 36 of the IBC is now a development standard, DS 11-01. The minimum setback for grading limits is 2', 1/5 of the vertical height of cut with a maximum of 10' or ½ of the height of the fill slope with a minimum of 2' and a maximum of 10'. Revise the grading plan to meet the minimum setback. Clearly indicate the grading limit with a different line type than the property line. DS 11-01.9. 6. On Sheet X-10 detail D/2 is not located on sheet X-2. Indicate the correct location of detail D. 7. The SWPPP is approved. Please submit three copies of the grading plan with the next submittal. |
| 10/12/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/14/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/14/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |