Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T04BU01574
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/10/2005 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | assigned by JPV |
| 01/10/2005 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Site Plan 1. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal. 2. Address comment number 1. 3. Submit a copy of a stamped approved site plan along with the grading plan for review. This is a previous review comment. It is difficult to determine what changes have been made or are intended to be made. 4. I'm including a copy of a previous review dated October 19, 2004. Address all 5 comments. DATE: October 19, 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04BU01574 PROJECT NAME: Lecocq Apartments PROJECT ADDRESS: 1204 N. Winstel PROJECT REVIEWER: James C. Tate, P.E., CFM The following items must be revised or added to the Grading Plan. Please include a letter with the next submittal addressing how all the engineering and drainage comments have been addressed. Resubmittal Required: Grading Plan, Drainage Report Grading Plan 1. A letter must be included in the next Grading Plan submittal addressing all the engineering and drainage comments. PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 2. Include a copy of the stamped approved Site Plan with the Grading Plan re-submittal. This is a previous review comment. The stamped approved Site Plan MUST be submitted. PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 3. Include a copy of a revised drainage report with the next submittal. It appears that the intention is to change the drainage from the approved Site Plan. Changes to drainage must be substantiated in a revised drainage report. The Drainage Report submitted does not address the changes that were made to the approved Site Plan. The report must address any and all proposed changes made to the approved plan. PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 4. Submit both Sheets C1 and C2 for approval as a Grading Plan. The sheets must agree with the approved Site Plan. They must also agree with the revised Drainage Report. Label the Grading Plan as "Grading Plan". PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT Drainage Report 1. The Drainage report as submitted does not address the changes that were made on the approved Site Plan. The report treats this project as a proposed development. However, the project is almost complete. This is actually a revision to the approved Site Plan. The Drainage Report must address the proposed changes made to the approved drainage structures and the effect this will have on this property and adjoining properties. There are also proposed changes to approved elevations and FFE. These changes must also be addressed in the Drainage Report as they affect the drainage both on-site and off-site. The approved Site Plan was not included in this submittal, so it is difficult to determine what changes have been made or are intended to be made. Existing elevations both onsite and offsite are critical in determining the proposed drainage patterns. PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT |
| 01/11/2005 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit approved tentative plat including landscape and NPP plans to continue review. |
| 02/01/2005 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | February 2, 2005 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering and Landscape Review Section and approval of the site plan. 2. Two copies of the approved and stamped site plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plan. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal for compliance with all zoning comments. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/02/2005 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |