Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING
Permit Number - T04BU01240
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/28/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: 1 July 2005 SUBJECT: Safeway Grading Plan Review REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04BU01240 SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the Subject Grading and Utility Plans. The plans may not be approved prior to Site Plan approval. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans/Text must be included with a resubmittal. All applicable revisions to the Site Plan must be reflected on the Grading/Utility Plans.. Additional Grading plan comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, depending upon the extent of Site Plan revisions. Please include a copy of the Site Plan for reference with the resubmittal, or, include the Grading and Utility plan/package with SWPPP's, and permit application with the Site/Floodplain Use Permit resubmittal package. Address the following comments in you resubmittal: 1. Since the previous submittal the City of Tucson has changed its grading standards from the local admendments to the International Building Code to the City of Tucson Development Standards (DS). Revise Paving and Grading Note # 7 to reference DS 11-01.0. Excavation and grading requirements may be accessed at the following site: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/DevStd1101.pdf 2. Revise the details for the curb ramp details on C1.6 to show truncated domes as specified on the site plan. Remove references to MAG and use City of Tucson / Pima County Standard Details where applicable. 3. As previously commented. provide retention/detention basin cross-sections, all inlet and outlet weir locations and details fully labeled and dimensioned. Your comment letter indicates that the details are on Sheet C3.1. Provide sheet C3.1 in the resubmittal package or provide the requested details on one of the included sheets. SWPPP comments: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan does not meet the requirements of the Construction General Permit. Revise the plan and complete the Checklist available on the ADEQ web site. Indicate on the checklist where each requirement has been met. Include the completed checklist with the resubmittal. The checklist is available at: http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/water/permits/download/cswppp.pdf General Comments: As noted in the summary, additional comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, depending upon the extent and nature of site revisions, in response to Site Plan review comments. The Tucson Department of Transportation (TDOT) may require a Private Improvement Agreement (PIA) for the necessary right of way improvements. Contact Permits and Codes Section at 791-5100 for questions. Please address all of the above comments. Resubmittal shall include at a minimum of one copy of the Site Plan, 3 copies of revised Grading and Utility Plans, and 3 copies of SWPPP's with text, addressing all of the comments listed above. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Sr. Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 07/08/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
| 07/16/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 07/16/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/09/2005 | JMORALE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/09/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |