Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T04BU01147
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/03/2004 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 3, 2004 TO: Tony Tsang, A. C. Tsang Engineering Group, Inc. SUBJECT: Pima Federal Credit Union, Grading Plan REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04BU01147 SUMMARY: The Grading Plan was reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering Division. The Grading Plan was not approved at this time. Grading Plan comments: 1) The Development Plan must be approved before the grading plan can be approved. The Grading Plan must be consistent with the approved Development Plan. Include a copy of the approved Development Plan with the grading permit application. 2) The temporary basins are not discussed in the drainage report and there is no indication of the need or the purpose of these basins. If the basins are intended for stormwater sediment control, they should be only within the SWPPP. Otherwise, address the purpose and sizing in the drainage report. Clearly indicate when the temporary basins will be removed. 3) Revise the finish floor elevation for the building to reflect that the building will be a minimum of 6 inches above the top of curb as indicated in the drainage statement. 4) Rezoning conditions for the project include a requirement that the roof and paved area drainage be directed to water harvesting areas. Revise the grading plan to show compliance with this requirement. 5) Provide details and delineation of the required water harvesting areas. SWPPP comments: 6) Provide a detail for the Concrete Truck Washout Area to show how concrete truck washout and surplus discharge will be prevented from entering any drainage structure. 7) Part IV.B.2.c Explicitly indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over project specifications (including the ability to make modifications in specifications). 8) Part IV.B.2.c Explicitly indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over day-to-day activities at the construction site. 9) Part IV.C.2.d. Provide an estimate of the pre-construction runoff coefficient. 10) Part IV.C.2.e. Revise the general location map so the project is in the approximate center and show a 1-mile radius around site. 11) Part IV.C.2.e. Include and identify receiving waters in the general location map. 12) Part IV.C.3.a. Identify on the map drainage patterns and approximate slopes after grading. 13) Part IV.C.3.d. Identify on the map locations where stabilization practices are expected to occur 14) Part IV.C.3.g. Identify on the map locations where stormwater is discharged to a surface water (e.g. ephemeral waters or dry washes) and to MS4s 15) Part IV.C.4. Identify on the map or in a narrative, the nearest receiving water(s), including ephemeral and intermittent streams, dry sloughs, arroyos. 16) Part IV.D.2.b. Describe the procedures for modifying or replacing BMPs if one is found to be ineffective or installed incorrectly. 17) Part IV.D.2.c. Describe the practice and schedule to routinely remove offsite accumulation of sediment. 18) Part IV.D.4.c. Describe record keeping efforts, include forms/checklists used for keeping the required data. 19) Part IV.D.4.c.i. Maintain records of the dates when major grading activities occurred. 20) Part IV.D.4.c.ii. Maintain records of when construction activities cease (temporarily or permanently). 21) Part IV.D.4.c.iii. Maintain records of when stabilization is initiated and completed and any reason for delays. 22) Part IV.D.6. Describe post-construction stormwater management measures. 23) Part IV.F. Include copy of AZPDES permit (AZG2003-001). 24) Part IV.J.1. Each Operator must sign the SWPPP. Revise the Grading Plan to address all of these comments and resubmit two copies for review along with a copy of the approved Development Plan. If you would like to meet with me to discuss any of these comments please call me at (520) 791-5550 ext. 1161 or email me at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 06/04/2004 | Joseph Linville | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit approved set of development plans including landscape plan to continue review. |
| 06/15/2004 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | June 15, 2004 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering Review Section. 2. Two copies of the approved and stamped development/site plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with grading plan. 3. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan, may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. 4. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal for compliance with all zoning comments. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/15/2004 | BETH GRANT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/15/2004 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |