Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T04BU01136
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/03/2004 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Drainage Comments, 06/03/2004 Grading Plan Comments: 1- Label the plans as "Grading Plan" 2- Include the site administrative address. 3- Reference the CDRC Case number in the Title Block. 4- All lettering shall be equivalent of twelve (0.12) point or greater in size in order to reproduce legible copies after the approved plans have been microfilmed. 5- The Basis of Bearing description should match the description on the Development Plan. Additionally, show how the parcel ties into the basis of bearing. 6- Show proposed roof drainage. Additionally, 10-year flow must be conveyed completely through sidewalk scuppers when the runoff crosses any sidewalk/walkway. This also applies to roof drainage. Demonstrate compliance with this requirement. 7- Revise on sheet C-5.0 the General Notes heading from "City of East Tucson" to "City of Tucson". 8- Revise Note "C" on Sheet C-5.0 to reference "City of Tucson", not City of Glendale. 9- Revise the telephone number in Note "D" to reflect the City of Tucson number. 10- Add a General Note for Blue Staking the project before any excavation work. 11- It is not clear how the water will drain south of the proposed building. It appears that the water will pond at two location behind the restaurant. 12- Provide a detailed response letter with the next submittal that explains how the comments were addressed and references the exact locations/sheets where the revisions were made. |
| 06/04/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit approved development plans including landscape and NPPO plans. |
| 06/15/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | June 15, 2004 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments: Zoning will review and approve the grading plan upon final approval by the Engineering section. Two copies of the approved and stamped development/site plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with grading plan. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan, may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/15/2004 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/15/2004 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |