Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T04BU01116
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/25/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. This site is subject to the provisions of: CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NO. 9-04.0 HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT SITE IMPROVEMENT including Vegetation preservation and re-vegetation per DS 9-04.3.2. Revise grading note as necessary. 2. Submit NPPO plan per DS 2-15.0. 3. Identify the limits of grading and areas of non-disturbance per DS 9-04.3.1.A.2 If natural areas are designated on a site or lot, temporary fencing will be installed where they abut construction areas in order to prevent encroachment into the natural areas 4. Note: All plants designated, as preserved-in-place shall be retained at their existing grade during and after construction. Preservation fencing per DS 2-06. Figure 1 is required to be installed beyond the "drip-line" of the vegetation by one-half (½) the distance of the "drip-line" radius. DS 2-15.6.A 5. Note: Prior to any site disturbance a pre-grading inspection is required. Inspections may be scheduled by calling the IVR system at (520) 740-6970, inspection #9015 or by calling the Landscape Field Representative directly at 791-5640 Ext. 1140. |
| 06/30/2004 | Paul Machado | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Ray Graffam DATE: July 6, 2004 Owner/Applicant 8731 E. Desert Spring Tucson, Arizona 85730 SUBJECT: 10950 E. Escalante Road Grading Plan T04BU01116 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 36 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan and Hydrology Report The Grading Plan (GP) and Hydrology Report (HR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Grading Plan:The Grading Plan cannot be reviewed or approved prior to an approved Site Plan. 1. The content and format of the Site Plan should follow D. S. 2-02.0. Hydrology report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. A Hydrology report is required for parcels affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. 3. The content and format of the Hydrology report should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.3. 4. Show the project address on the cover of the Hydrology report. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 08/03/2004 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | August 3, 2004 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering and Landscape Review Section and approval of the site plan. 2. Two copies of the approved and stamped development/site plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with grading plan. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/03/2004 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |