Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

PRO is currently experiencing an outage. Some documents and records may not be available on PRO momentarily. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to restore full access.

Permit Number: T04BU00652
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL

Permit Number - T04BU00652
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/17/2004 LAITH ALSHAMI ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 06/17/2004

1- It was determined in a field meeting that the slope east of the pad on lot 5 will be moved closer to the pad, and the easement area will be brought back to predevelopment grade in order to prevent the water from backing up into the neighbor's property. It was also determined that the slope will be protected with rip rap. Revise sheets 1/5, 3/5 and 5/5 accordingly.
2- Cross section H/5 should be revised to reflect the requirement in comment #1.
3- Cross section G/5 in inconsistent with the slope shown in the profile on sheet 3/5. Correct the discrepancy.
06/17/2004 Joseph Linville NPPO REVIEW Denied 1) Revise the grading plans to establish limits of grading as described in general note 16 on sheet 1 of the grading plan in order to meet the requirements of the approved plat, landscape and native plant preservation plans. The understory of protected plants is to be preserved at existing grade for a distance of 1.5 times the drip-line radius. A line which identifies the limt of grading/disturbance is necessary.

2) The revised native plant preservation and landscape plans are to be submitted to the CDRC Office as a revision to
Tentative Plat S02-022.
Resubmit these plans when stamped approved by CDRC with the revised grading plans.
07/02/2004 David Rivera ZONING REVIEW Denied July 2, 2004

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

David Rivera
Senior Planner

Comments:


1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering and Landscape Review Section.

2. If revisions to the tentative plat, NPPO or landsacape plans are neccessary please submit revised copies to CDRC for review, approval and stamps.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/12/2004 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
07/12/2004 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed