Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Stopped
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING
Permit Number - T04BU00475
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING
Review Status: Stopped
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/18/2004 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1) All disturbed areas shall be landscaped, reseeded, or treated with an inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7. Indicate on grading plan, treatment for disturbed areas. 2) Landscaping and Screening Regulations allow the use of seeds as a ground cover in lieu of decomposed granite. Where the use of seeds is permitted, selection of seed material will be from plants on the Low Water Use/Drought Tolerant Plant List, Exhibit II. Also, if the area that is to be reseeded is not within the public right-of-way, seed selection may be as per Sec. 9-06.4.2, Native Seeds per DS 2-06.4.3 3) Fencing shall be required during construction for all undisturbed natural desert areas per DS 2-6.0 Figure-1 4) Add note to grading plan. Under no circumstances shall development encroach to the base or trunk of a Native Plant. Damaged plants shall be replaced with the same size plant at a one-to one (1:1) Ratio of like genus and species per LUC 3.8.6.7.E |
| 06/03/2004 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Sinclair Oil Co. Trenching/Grading Review REVIEWER: Doug Williams DATE: 3 June 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T04BU00475/T04OT01100 T14S, R14E, Section 30 Resubmittal Required: Revised Grading Plans, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans with text, and Floodplain Use Permit Application. SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the subject plans. Approval is not recommended at this time. A field visit to the subject site has revealed that the trenching performed along Campbell Avenue appears to be within the public right of way. As noted on the previous review, a right of way permit is required for any construction, excavation or development related work activity in the right of way. Contact Permits and Codes Section, Transportation Department (TDOT) at 791-5100 for permit issuance and/or inquiries relating to permitting for this work. The following comments must be addressed prior to resubmittal: 1. The 2' setback from property lines to toe of fill slopes does not appear to be accurate, as depicted in section 3/2. This detail must be revised to reflect accurate depiction of existing property lines. 2. Depict current right of way dimensioning on sheet 2, and ensure all details reflect current right of way/property lines for all public streets bounding the project, fully labeled and dimensioned. 3. The opening widths of the proposed post and cable blockades must be extended to the limits of the 100-year floodplain and/or riparian habitat limits, whichever is greater. The habitat limits appear to be approximately 300 feet wide where flow exits the site at 36th Street and at the northern acceptance point on Campbell Ave., and 250 feet at the southern acceptance point on Campbell Ave. Revise the dimensions provided in the details on sheet 2 to ensure no disturbance will occur within these limits. If trenching has occurred within these limits, the trenches must be backfilled and compacted to ensure no interception of flows will occur during a regulatory flow event (provide notation on the plan where this may be applicable). 4. The proposal that the berm and trench serve as a sediment control measure is not acceptable. Pollution controls must be provided for the excavated earth material. Installation of acceptable control measures must be provided at the toe of all excavated material, or alternatively, compaction of the excavated material will be acceptable. Provide appropriate notation on all applicable grading and SWPP plan sheets indicating conformance with such, and revise the text accordingly (pages 3-5, minimum). Resubmittal will require revised Grading and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and text addressing all of the comments provided above. Please assure Floodplain Use Permit Applications accompanying each grading permit application have been included with a resubmittal. Please note that confirmation of right of way permitting will be required prior to approval of the grading and/or floodplain Use Permits, where applicable. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us. Douglas Williams Sr. Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 06/08/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | June 8, 2004 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments: Zoning will review and approve the grading plan upon final approval by the Engineering and Landscape sections. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/11/2004 | ANY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Stopped |