Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T04BU00475
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/24/2004 | Doug Williams | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Sinclair Oil Co. Trenching/Grading Review REVIEWER: Doug Williams DATE: 24 March 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T04BU00474-476 T14S, R14E, Section 30 Resubmittal Required: Revised Grading Plans, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans with text, and a Floodplain Use Permit Application. SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the subject plans. Approval is not recommended at this time. The following comments must be addressed prior to resubmittal: 1. Clearly label grading limits on all plan sheets. 2. Please provide the site address in the title block (sheet 1). 3. Provide the total area of disturbance on each plan set. Three sets of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and text addressing appropriate stormwater controls must be provided for each site where the total area of disturbance is one acre or greater, or if the site disturbance is part of a larger common plan. For information regarding Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan requirements, visit http://www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/download/cswppp.pdf 4. Provide a Grading Note that grading/trenching shall be in conformance with the 2000 International Building Code (IBC) - local amendment (Chapter 36 - Excavation and Grading). For further information, visit http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/2000_IBC_Amendments.pdf 5. Depict all utility locations, clearly labeled with dimensions to trenching activities on each site. Include reference to utility plan numbers in all instances. 6. A minimum 2' setback from all property lines to toe of fill slopes is required in accordance with Section 14.3 of the 2000 IBC (Chapter 36). Revise detail 3/2 to reflect this requirement, and include depiction and dimensioning to existing sidewalks. 7. Due to the designation of regulatory floodplain, riparian habitat (intermediate), and Critical and Sensitive Biological Community on the eastern parcel -1850 E. 36th Street - a floodplain use permit is required for the proposed improvements in these locations. Both parcels to the west (3345 S. Park Ave. and 3202 S. Park Ave.) are also affected by regulatory floodplain. Grading plan/permit application resubmittals must be accompanied by floodplain use permit applications for these parcels as well. 8. The opening widths of the proposed post and cable blockades must be extended to the limits of the 100-year floodplain and/or riparian habitat limits, whichever is greater. The habitat limits appear to be approximately 300 feet wide where flow exits the site at 36th Street and at the northern acceptance point on Campbell Ave., and 250 feet at the southern acceptance point on Campbell Ave. Please revise the dimensions provided in the details on sheet 3 to meet these dimensions, at a minimum. If trenching has occurred within these limits, they must be backfilled and compacted to ensure no interception of flows will occur during a regulatory flow event (provide notation on the plan where this may be applicable). 9. A right of way permit is required for any construction, excavation or development related work activity in the public right of way. Contact Permits and Codes Section, Transportation Department (TDOT) at 791-5100 for questions or inquiries. Resubmittal will require revised Grading plans addressing all of the comments provided above, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans with text, and Floodplain Use Permit Applications accompanying each grading permit application If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us. Douglas Williams Sr. Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 03/25/2004 | Patricia Gehlen | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | March 26, 2004 Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Please provide a response ltter stating how all zoning comments have been addressed. 1. It is not clear from the plan if there is to be any type of development on any of the sites which have been disturbed by the trenching or grading. Please clarify if development is proposed. If development is proposed for this site a site plan or possibly a development plan may be required to be submitted for review and approval. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the response to this comment. 2. Please label the exisitng and future right of way widths for all streets on which the property has street frontage. Please kee in mind that Park Avenue, 36th Street and Kino Parkway are major streets and are subject to future widening. It is important to verify that the trenching will not encroach onto the exisitng or future right of way. 3. Zoning will review and approve the grading plan once all zoning comments have been addressed and upon final review and approval of the grading plan by the Engineering Review Section. |
| 04/01/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit Approved site plan, and NPPO plan or Application for Exception per DS 2-15.0 |