Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T04BU00205
Parcel: 116276880

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: GRADING

Permit Number - T04BU00205
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/26/2004 Patricia Gehlen ZONING REVIEW Approved
02/27/2004 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Lindeman Residence - Grading Review
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 27 February 2004
ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T04CM00349 & T04BU00205

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the Site/Grading plan received on 27 January 2004. Approval is not recommended at this time. Please address the following comments:

GRADING PLAN COMMENTS

1. Provide a general grading note specifying conformance to the 2000 International Building Code - local amendment (Chapter 36 - Excavation and Grading). This document may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/2000_IBC_Amendments.pdf
2. Provide geotechnical report with recommendations addressing earthwork, setbacks, slope stability/treatment and drainage for the site.
3. Please omit either the "existing topo to be modified" or the "proposed topo" from the legend and the corresponding delineations on the plan. Preferably, depict "existing" and "proposed" topo/contours.
4. Provide a basis of elevation with reference to City of Tucson (COT) Field Book and Page;
5. Provide the recording information (Bk 49 Pg 35) for the private drainage easement.
6. Depict and label the 10' Public Utility Easement, as shown on the Final Plat for Tohono Ridge, with recording information (Bk 51 Pg 89).
7. Provide a minimum of one northwest - southeast cross section. Please include the driveway, property line, existing curb and sidewalk locations, and indicate the elevation increments, fully labeled and dimensioned on all cross-sections, at a minimum.
8. Observation of current photo-topography indicates area drainage may enter this site currently, and that upon construction of the driveway entrance, there may be an increase in such if cutting the curb, as noted (if the existing curb is 2' wedge curb, remove the note for cutting of the curb). Provide proposed spot elevations or clearly depict proposed contours on the plan in this area, demonstrating drainage will be accommodated and conveyed around the proposed home. Area drainage must be discharged in a fashion similar or identical to existing conditions, without diverting flow to adjacent property.
9. Remove the "+/-" symbol from all elevations
10. The grading limits and callout arrow provided are not clear. Please insure the limits of grading are very clear on a revised plan.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Doug Williams
Sr. Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
02/27/2004 Andrew Connor NPPO REVIEW Denied 1) Native Vegetation Disturbance Plan included in original Tohono Ridge Tentative Plat states the mitigation of (7) 15-gal Cecidium mycrophyllum (Foothills Palo Verde) for Lot 22. Submit Site Plan with placement of trees.

2) Note on site plan: Revegetation of disturbed areas will use Upland Seed Mix which includes:

Botanical Name Common Name / lbs/acre

Encelia farinosa (P, C/W) Brittlebush / 1.5
Ambrosia (Franseria) deltoidea (P, C) Triangle-Leaf Bursage / 4.0
Larrea tridentata (divaricata) (P, W) Creosote Bush, Greasewood / 4.0
Acacia constricta (P, W) Whitethorn Acacia, Mescat / 2.0
Cercidium floridum (P, W) Blue Palo Verde / 2.0
Acacia greggii (P, W) Cat's Claw Acacia / 2.0
Sphaeralcea ambigua (P, C/W) Desert Globe-Mallow / .5
Baileya multiradiata (P, C/W) Desert Marigold / 1.0

3) Revise comment on site plan to reflect:

All exposed exterior walls and roofs of structures, retaining walls, and accessory structures, except satellite dishes, shall be earth tone in color and will blend with the predominant natural colors found on the lot or parcel. LUC 2.8.1.8.C

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/02/2004 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
03/02/2004 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed