Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T04BU00161
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/26/2004 | James Tate | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: January 29, 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04BU00161 PROJECT NAME: Earlybird Subdivision PROJECT ADDRESS: 107 W. Pastime PROJECT REVIEWER: James C. Tate, P.E., CFM The following items must be revised or added to the Grading Plan. Please include a letter with the next submittal addressing how all the engineering and floodplain comments have been addressed. Resubmittal Required: Grading Plan Grading Plan 1. Dimension the basins with a length and width. 2. Show the Grading Limits on the plan. Required setbacks can be found in IBC Chapter 36 Section 14 3. Proposed developments disturbing areas exceeding 1 acre are subject to NPDES requirements. The grading area can not be determined because the grading limits are not shown on the plan (see comment 2 above). The two existing home lots show a comment, "grade to drain". This would indicate that it is intended to grade the entire project. NPDES would then apply. Please supply a NPDES submittal with the next grading plan submittal. 4. If it is intended to change the existing drainage at the existing home lots, revise the drainage report to reflect the changed conditions. 4. Show a weir detail. 5. The legend has an item labeled, "proposed pavement grades". However, the plan shows this item to include pad grades and top of curb grades. The grades shown on the plan must be differentiated so that it can be determined what is being called out on the plan. 6. Show several pad grades on each lot to aid in determining drainage. 7. The existing contours shown on the Grading Plan do not match those shown on the Tentative Plat. It appears on the Tentative Plat that the existing manufactured homes have been elevated on fill (or ground set above grade). Is it intended that these homes remain? Existing grades must be shown on the plan and it should be properly indicated how these grades will meet the proposed grades. 8. Note the contour interval by the north arrow. 9. Show a cross section of the basin. Indicate the location of the cross section on the plan. 10. Remove the, "Preliminary, not for construction" stamp. 11. Show the scupper detail from the Tentative Plat. 12. Show and label all traffic signs. 13. Show the location and type of survey pins placed on the lot corners. 14. For the basins, list top elevation, bottom elevation, weir invert elevation, 100-yr. peak WSEL, bank protection. All drainage information provided on the Tentative Plat must be provided on the Grading Plan. The Grading Plan will be used for project inspections. 15. The typical street section is not as detailed as the one provided on the Tentative Plat. Show the Tentative Plat detail on the Grading Plan. Show signs on the detail. 16. The Tentative Plat shows a RCP balance pipe between the basins. The Grading Plan shows a PVC pipe. |
| 02/10/2004 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning 2/10/2004 Zoning will review and approve the grading plan once Engineering has approved. |
| 02/18/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit NPPO plan per DS 2-15.3.0 or Native Plant Preservation Application for Exception. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/19/2004 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/19/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |