Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T04BU00072
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/06/2004 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: February 6, 2004 TO: Ed Roll; WLB Group, Inc. SUBJECT: Eckerd Drugstore at Grant and Rosemont, Grading Plan Review and Floodplain Use Permit Review REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04BU00072 and T04OT00064 SUMMARY: The Grading Plan was reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering Division. The Grading Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) were not approved at this time. The Floodplain Use Permit will be approved when the Grading Plan and SWPPP are approved. Grading Plan comments: 1. The note under the signature line for the City Engineer is not applicable to permits issued by the City of Tucson. Please remove from the cover sheet. 2. Show the floodplain limits on the grading plan. SWPPP Comments: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) submitted for the Eckerd Drugstore project does not meet the requirements of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AzPDES) General Permit for Discharge from Construction Activities to Waters of the United States (General Permit or CGP). 1. Indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over project specifications (including the ability to make modifications in specifications). (Part IV.B.2.c) 2. Indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over day-to-day activities at the construction site. (Part IV.B.2.c) 3. Identify on the location map the receiving waters within one mile of the construction site. (Part IV.C.2.e) 4. The EPA field inspectors have told us that the SWPPPs should be written to be specific to the project and not general and generic. Revise Sections 2-6 so that all practices are applicable to this project. Provide instructions for implementing all of the identified practices. All listed practices will be considered mandatory and must be shown on the site map as required by the CGP. (Part IV.C.3 and Part IV.D.1) 5. Revise the intended sequence of soil disturbing events to reflect the expected events for this project. The sequence should include demolition of the existing building and parking areas (Part IV.C.2.b) 6. Specify that when sediment escapes the construction site, offsite accumulations of sediment must be routinely removed and at a frequency sufficient to ensure no adverse effects on water quality. (Part IV.D.2.a and Part IV.D.2.c) 7. Section 1.7 states that all of site will be disturbed, section 2.2.2 instructs the operator to preserve vegetation where no construction activity is planned or will occur at a later date, section 2.2.1 calls for scheduling to minimized extended disturbed areas and section 6.1.1 indicates that no more than one half of the site will be denuded at any one time. Provide instructions for implementing these contradictory directives. 8. Revise the SWPPP so the descriptions of pre-construction conditions and runoff coefficient provided in the SWPPP conform to the information in the drainage report.. 9. The operator must maintain the following records as part of the SWPPP. Provide pages or tables to record the required information. (Part IV.D.4.c) a. Dates when major grading activities occur. (Part IV.D.4.c.i) b. Dates when construction activities temporarily or permanently cease on a portion of the site. (Part IV.D.4.c.ii) c. Dates when stabilization measures are initiated and completed and reasons for delay, if applicable, under IV.D.4.b. (Part IV.D.4.c.iii) 10. Revise the site map to show estimated slopes after grading and to show the location of non-structural controls. (Part IV.C.3.d and Part IV.C. 3.a) 11. On the site map, show and label locations where stormwater is discharged to a surface water or to an MS4. 12. Revise the description of the receiving water. The name of the wash west of the project location is the Arcadia Wash. 13. Add a note stating that if sediment escapes from the site that it will be routinely removed at a frequency sufficient to ensure no adverse effects on water quality. (Part IV.D.2.c) 14. Describe how all non-stormwater discharges will be eliminated or reduced to the extent feasible. (Part IV.D.7) 15. Describe appropriate BMPs to minimize pollutants in any non-stormwater discharges. Superchlorinated wastewaters must be held on-site until the chlorine dissipates, or otherwise dechlorinated prior to discharge, except if used in emergency firefighting. (Part IV.D.7) 16. Provide clear instructions and details for implementation of each specified BMP. Provide specific scheduling for each practice, relative to major construction activities. For example, describe when the storm drain inlet protection will be installed, relative to the installation of the storm drains. Include installation details for the measures to be installed. 17. Revise the descriptions of the stabilized construction entrance to show that the stabilized construction entrances will be maintained from removal of existing pavement until the vehicle use areas are paved. Include instructions for keeping adjacent paved roads free of dirt that may be tracked onto them. Describe procedures for inspection for tracked sediment and for scheduling cleanup. (Part IV.D.8.b and Part IV.H.4) 18. Include a certification and signature for each operator in accordance with Part VII.K. (Part IV.J.1) Revise the Grading Plan and the SWPPP to address all of these comments and resubmit two copies of the grading plan and three copies of the SWPPP. Include a copy of the approved Development Plan. As we discussed, I will go over these comments and requirement at our meeting. If you have any questions about any of these comments please call me at (520) 791-5550 ext. 1161. Loren Makus Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 02/09/2004 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning 2/09/2004 Zoning will review and approve the grading plans once Engineering has approved. |
| 02/11/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit approved development plan including landscape and NPP0 plans. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/25/2004 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/12/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |