Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T03OT01856
Parcel: 137051590

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T03OT01856
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/03/2003 Doug Williams ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Eagle Appliances
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 3 November 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03OT01856
T15S, R13E, Sec.2

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the Drainage Report and Site Plan received October 17, 2003. Approval of the Site Plan is not recommended at this time. The following comments must be addressed prior to resubmittal:

SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

1. Depict existing and future Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) sight visibility triangles (Development Standards - DS 2-02.2.1.10 and 3-01.5.1 B 2);
2. Please identify whether the CMU wall and sidewalk are existing or proposed. If proposed, new 6' sidewalks are required on all Major Streets and Routes - 3' from back of curb. Provide a typical wall opening detail or note with notation for intervals/spacing for acceptance and conveyance of offsite flows from the east and south (DS 2-02.2.1.27);
3. Provide sidewalk scuppers for conveyance of 10-year flows at a minimum, under the sidewalk areas in the Irvington Road right of way at both basin discharge locations, or provide proposed spot elevation data demonstrating the basins will discharge to the driveway entrance before exiting the site (DS 2-08.4.1 and 2-08.5.1 E);
4. The proposed finish grade elevations provided indicate there will not be offsite acceptance of stormwater runoff from the south and east. Please revise the plan accordingly, demonstrating continued acceptance of flows at these locations, in accordance with the drainage report;
5. A centralized refuse provision is required for all new commercial developments, in accordance with DS 6-01.0. Please revise note # 21, or provide written authorization from Environmental Services Department for collection service as indicated;
6. Please correct the notes to replace existing chain link fence with wrought iron fence. The drainage report specifies curb openings at these locations - revise as necessary, in accordance with the report;
7. Provide a note stating a) that the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for the operation, maintenance, and liability for the detention basins; b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the facility at least once each year, and that these reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and detention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and d) that the owner(s) agree to reimburse the city for any and all costs associated with maintaining the facility, should the City find the owner(s) deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain the facility. Refer to the City of Tucson's Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (Development Standard 10-02.0), Section 14.3.3 for inspection report details.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Doug Williams
Sr. Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
11/14/2003 Joseph Linville LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 "Fifty (50) percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover". The width of the landscape border "is that area between the required screen and the property line". revise the plans to provide 50% vegetative coverage of the area between the screening required along the street and the property line.

2) All unpaved or undeveloped portions of the site are required to be treated with an appropriate dust control material, such as decomposed granite. revise the plans to include dust control for the site and the adjacent right-of-way area out to the street curb. LUC 3.7.2.7., LUC 3.7.2.4.A.3

3) Tree planters should be a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width. Provide wider planting areas for the trees proposed along the east property line. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c

4) Any outdoor storage areas on the site area required to be screened per LUC 3.7.2-I. If outdoor storage is proposed a 6' high screen is required along all sides of the storage areas.

5) The site does not appear to provide for pedestrian access.
Revise the plans tomply with LUC 3.2.8.4 and DS 2-08.0

6) Barriers per DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 are required at the edges of the vehicular area and to protect landscape areas. Revise the plans to include a suitable barrier between paved and unpaved areas.
11/17/2003 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit a native plant preservation plan or application for exception. LUC 3.8, DS 2-15.0
11/21/2003 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL

TO: Greg Carlson
1521 E. Broadway Blvd
Tucson, AZ 85719
(520) 624-0070

FROM: Peter McLaughlin
Senior Planner
Development Services Dept.

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner
Development Services Dept.

PROJECT:
T03OT01856
Eagle Appliances
727 W. Irvington Road
Site Plan Review (1st review)

TRANSMITTAL: November 20, 2003


COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This project was reviewed as a change of use. Full code compliance is required.
DS 2-02
2. Per IBC Sec. 1106.4, the one handicapped parking space provided must be van accessible, and be provided with an access aisle with a minimum width of 8 feet. Please revise drawing, which shows only a 6-foot aisle. Provide the maximum slope of the handicap access aisle to be provided. Also, provide a calculation of handicapped parking required and provided. Revise the fine amount in the handicap parking sign to read "$500". The handicap parking space detail says "see site plan for sign location" but no sign location is indicated on the drawing.
ANS/ IBC
3. The proposed area to be used for appliance display, sales and service must be defined and dimensioned on the drawing. Revise vehicle parking calculations to show that parking is required at one vehicle space per 200 square feet of the area used for appliance sales, display and repair.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.8
DS 2-02.2.2.A.4
4. Revise the use and development designator in site plan note #4 to reflect the more intense of the two proposed uses, which is retail appliance sales, as indicated on the drawing. The correct development designator for the sales use in the C-2 zone is "31". Also add the LUC restriction which the proposed use is subject to. The general merchandise sales use in the C-2 zone is subject to LUC 3.5.9.2.A.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.31
LUC 2.5.4.2.B.3
5. Revise the legal description under zoning information to include the lot numbers (Lots 18 and 19). Revise legal description in location map to be correct.
DS 2-02.2.1. A.2

6. Based on the proposed use (general merch. sales), bicycle parking is required at 8 percent of the vehicle parking spaces provided, 50 % class 1, 50 % class 2. However, for uses providing fewer than 50 vehicle parking spaces class 2 bicycle parking may be used. A minimum of two class 2 bicycle parking spaces are required. Please provide bicycle parking calc to indicate two spaces required and provided. Also, provide a bicycle parking detail, which dimensions the bicycle parking layout, including maneuverability area on the plan per DS 2-09.
LUC 3.3.3.5
LUC 3.3.4
DS 2-02.2.1.A.9
DS 2-02.2.2.A.4
7. Please add the recordation information (book and page reference numbers) for the utility easement to the site plan.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.20
8. Add the zoning (O-3) for the adjacent parcel to the south.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.28
9. Label existing and future curbs on the plan and dimension from street monument lines the distance to existing and future curbs.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.19
10. Pedestrian sidewalks must be provided to connect all areas of the site to be accessed by the public and to provide a connection the the pedestrian circulation path located in the adjacent street. Sidewalks must be made of concrete and be physically separated from adjacent PAALs/vehicle use area by use of raised concrete curbing. Clearly identify and dimension the the pedestrian sidewalks and show how they are to be physically separated. Remove site plan note 16.
DS 2-08.3.1
DS 2-02.2.1.A.12
11. A loading zone may be required if the defined sales area (see comment 3) is 1,500 square feet or greater. If applicable add loading zone calcs, show loading zone fully dimensioned on the drawing, and remove site plan note 15. DS 2-02.2.2.A.5
DS 2-02.2.1.A.14



12. Add existing and future sight-visibility triangles to the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10

13. Place a note on the plan stating that the project is designed to meet the criteria of Sec. 2.8.3, MS&R setback zone. LUC 2.8.3

14. Show the location, size and height of any proposed freestanding signage. Also, indicate if any billboards exist on the site. DS 2-02.2.1.13

15. Indicate the location of any proposed freestanding lighting on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.25

16. If there is a security gate proposed for the entrance to the project site, indicate its location and place a note on the plan stating that the gate is to remain open during business hours.

17. The proposed parking spaces must be provided with wheelstop curbs to prevent vehicles from overhanging landscaped areas or striking fences/walls. Dimension the wheelstops from the front of parking spaces per DS 3-05.2.3.C.2. Wheelstop curbing is to be located 2-½ feet from the front of parking spaces. DS 3-05.2.3.C


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.


PMc\siteplans03\T03CM01856a
11/21/2003 PETER MCLAUGHLIN HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied See zoning review comments.
11/24/2003 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/24/2003 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/24/2003 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed