Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T03OT00445
Parcel: 10510079B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T03OT00445
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/21/2003 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Denied 1. Indicate fire rating and opening protection for east exterior walls of "New Storage Facility" and "Bldg. B".
2. Submit complete code review checklist.
03/24/2003 BLANCA ESPINO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Site Plan
1. Indicate all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including height, roof slope and downspouts. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6

2. Indicate proposed finish floor elevation(s) and finish grades. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.16

3. Indicate if street is "Public" or "Private". D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18

4. Indicate all easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20

5. Indicate dimensions from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21

6. Indicate existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.23

7. Indicate refuse container location, size and access thereto fully dimensioned. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.32
03/28/2003 BLANCA ESPINO SANITATION REVIEW Denied SEE ENGINEERING FOLDER FOR COMMENTS.
04/21/2003 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next
submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.
CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. Per Pima County Assessors Records, the site is comprised of three (3) separate lots which must be combined into one by providing a copy of the recorded City of Tucson lot combination covenant and a copy of the approved Pima County Assessors Tax Combination form. Attached is a copy of the City of Tucson lot combination covenant. Contact the Assessors office for information regarding the Pima County Tax Combination form. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2)

2. Clarify the proposed building height. Building setbacks may not be verified for compliance until this information is clarified. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6)

3. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.4 perimeter yard indicator "CC", residential uses adjacent to O-3 zoning must be setback a distance based on the height of the exterior building wall. It does not appear that the building setback required from the east lot line meets the aforementioned LUC section. If a LOT Development Option (LDO) is applied for to request a setback modification please contact Frank Podgorski at 791-5550 for information on this process. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7)

4. Note the number of bedrooms in each unit under the vehicle parking calculation to verify compliance. Refer to LUC 3.3.4 "Multi-family Dwellings" for required parking. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8)

5. If the new storage facility will be used for commercial use, please include the square footage in the parking calculation. If it is proposed for residential use, please add a note, which states that the storage is for residential use only. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8)

6. Per LUC 3.3.3.5, a minimum of two (2) Class II bicycle parking spaces are required for the commercial use portion of this project. Revise the bicycle parking calculation and provide a fully dimensioned bicycle parking space detail per D.S. 2-09 standards. In addition, indicate the location of the bicycle parking facility on the plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9)

7. The cross access agreement must be recorded prior to site plan approval. Provide a copy of the recorded agreement for Development Services Department records. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11)

8. If applicable, provide a detail of existing and/or proposed freestanding signage (including billboard) and outdoor lighting on the site plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13)

9. All existing or proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20)

10. Revise the adjacent zoning classification for the property to the east. Correct zoning is O-3. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28)

11. Note the proposed land uses as they are listed under LUC Sec. 2.5.3.2. (i.e. General Merchandise Sales development designator 28, subject to Sec. 3.5.9.2.C and Family Dwelling development designator O). (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31)

12. Indicate the location of the refuse container. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.32)

13. Include the storage facility in the floor area calculation FAR (gross floor area divided by gross site area). Note the maximum allowed FAR (.35) and proposed FAR. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3)

14. Provide the lot coverage calculation. Refer to LUC Sec. 3.2.9 for information. Note the maximum allowed lot coverage (75%). (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3)

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Please submit for review, revised blueline or reproducible copies along with the redline copies of the site plan and response letter.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608.
04/21/2003 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved Previously approved exception.
04/21/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.1 "Street landscape borders shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet wide as measured from the street property line. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way line as determined by Sec. 2.8.3.4." Revise the plans to provide a 10' wide street landscape border.

2) Per LUC 2.7.2.4.A.2. "Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets." If applicable, provide verification, in writing, of City Engineer approval to utilize the public right of in order to meet code-required landscaping standards.

3) Per DS 2-06.3.3.E "Parking spaces may be designed so that the front of a vehicle overhangs into planter areas that are within a vehicular use area but cannot overhang into the
street landscape border." Revise the plans as necessary to eliminate any vehicle overhang into street landscape borders.

4) Per LUC 3.7.3.2.C "Screens may be located within the street landscape border, if the following criteria are met.
1. The street landscape border is a minimum of ten (10) feet wide.
2. Hedges and other vegetative screens shall not extend more than three (3) feet into the street landscape border. If, based on the growing characteristics of the type of plant used, the ultimate width of the vegetative screen will be greater than three (3) feet, the vegetative screen must be
sufficiently set back from the landscape border to accommodate the wider growth." Revise the proposed screening to comply with the code section.
04/28/2003 DAN CASTRO HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied Refer to Zoning Review Section comment four (4).

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/29/2003 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed