Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T03OT00123
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/01/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/01/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/05/2003 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Site Plan 1. Show all existing and proposed buildings direction of roof slopes with arrows. D.S. 2-02.2.1.6 2. A grading plan review is required. Submit grading plan along with an approved Site Plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.17 3. Indicate on site plan which Datum NGVD 1929 or NAVD 1988 is being used to indicate existing topographic contours and or water surface elevations. D.S. 2-02.2.1.23 4. Sanitation vehicles must meet minimum safety criteria; provision for on-site collection and maneuvering to avoid on-street traffic conflicts, minimum conflict with pedestrian and vehicular traffic along streets and on-site. Sanitation vehicles should not have to back up and try to maneuver truck to be aligned with the dumpster. The maximum back-up and distance for the collection vehicle shall be forty (40) feet. You may also contact John Clark with Solid Waste at 791-5543 ext.1126 for any questions and or concerns you may have. D.S. 2-02.2.1.32, D.S. 6-01.4.0 5. Residential and or structural may be required to review site plan due to site plan keynote #10. Fences are required when pools are proposed. |
| 05/30/2003 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | TO: Christos Vlahos 4711 E. Silver Place Tucson, AZ 85712 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T03OT00123 Hedrick Dr. Apartments 1741 E. Hedrick Drive TRANSMITTAL: June 2, 2003 Upon completion of the following revision/additions, an over the counter review may be arranged to obtain stamped approval by the zoning review section without resubmitting the site plan. The following items must be revised on or added to the site plan: 1. Revise the density calculation by replacing the times symbol with a divided by symbol. Add a statement that the the maximum residential density allowed in the R-2 zone is 15 units per acre. LUC 3.2.10 LUC 3.2.3.1.C 2. Does the dashed line located at 8 feet from the east and west lot lines represent a patio cover? It is not clear why there are two building setback dimensions from the west property line ( 8' and 10') and from the east property line (8 ' and 11'). To adjacent R-2 zoned property (to the east and west) the required building setback is the greater of 10 feet or ¾ height. If there are patio covers proposed at 8 feet from the east and west lot lines, a Lot Development Option (LDO) will be required. Also, dimension the building setback from its closest point to the east property line. LUC 3.2.6.4 DS 2-02.2.1.A.7 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/27/2003 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/02/2003 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |