Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T03OT00123
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/29/2003 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/04/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | A native plant Preservation plan is required. LUC 3.8, DS 2-15. Plans will not be accepted for review without the required plans. An OK to submit will be required by the Landscape Section prior to acceptance. |
| 02/04/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | A 5' high screen is required in the northern portion of the site where recreation areas are located within 100 feet of adjacent R-2 zoned property. The landscape plan may require revision based on native plant preservation requirements. To date a native plant preservation has not been received. DS 2-15.3.4.B |
| 02/13/2003 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/13/2003 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Christos Vlahos 4711 E. Silver Place Tucson, AZ 85712 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T03OT00123 Hedrick Dr. Apartments 1741 E. Hedrick Drive TRANSMITTAL: February 13, 2003 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Please provide a density calculation showing the number of units per acre proposed. With 10 units proposed on a 38,173 square foot (0.88 acre) site the density would be calculated as follows: 10 units ¸ 0.88 acres = 11.36 units per acre. Maximum residential density allowed in the R-2 zone is 15 units per acre. LUC 3.2.10 LUC 3.2.3.1.C 2. To adjacent R-2 zoned property (to the east and west) the required building setback is the greater of 10 feet or ¾ height. To adjacent commercial zoned properties (to the north) the required setback is the height of the building. From the street front property line the required building setback is the greater of 20 feet or 1-1/2 times the building height. Please provide a table listing these required setbacks on the site plan. The proposed patio covers dimensioned at 7 feet from P/L and the proposed building heights of 24 feet dimensioned at 16 feet from P/L will require Lot Development Options for both the east and west sides of the property. Please submit to the Planning Department an LDO application along with the required three copies of a site plan with Zoning Review comments and three copies of elevation drawings. LUC 3.2.6.4 LUC 3.2.6.5 DS 2-02.2.1.A.7 3. Provide the development designator ("K") in the general notes. LUC 2.3.5.2.A.2 4. Add a note that the proposed development is subject to LUC 3.5.7.1.F. LUC 2.3.5.2.A.2 5. Please specify on the drawing that the proposed heights of buildings (24 and 25 feet high) are measured from design grade elevation, not finished floor elevation. LUC 3.2.7.2.A 6. Dimension the building setback for the existing gazebo to the north property line. The required setback to adjacent C-1 zoned property to the north is the height of the structure. DS 2-02.2.1.A.7 7. Dimension the width of the Parking Area Access Lane (PAAL). DS 2-02.2.1.A.11 8. Dimension the depths of the backup spurs on both the east and west sides of the parking lot. A minimum 3-foot deep backup spur must be provided and an additional 3 feet behind the wheel barrier when there is an obstuction over 6 inches in height. The backup spur on the east side of the parking lot does not meet this requirement because of the location of the dumpster and the bollards. Please revise drawing. DS 3-05.2.2.D 9. The scale is incorrect on the project location map. Please revise. DS 2-02.2.1.A.4 10. Please provide the existing use of the site (i.e. vacant). DS 2-02.2.1.A.31 11. If any new freestanding signage or lighting is proposed as part of this development, indicate location and type. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 12. As indicated on the plan, the existing residential structure must be removed prior to site plan approval. Obtain demolition permit approval for this building from the Zoning Review Section. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 02/21/2003 | BLANCA ESPINO | SANITATION | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 02/21/2003 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Site Plan 1. Indicate all existing and proposed buildings along with roof slopes and downspouts. D.S. 2-02.2.1.6 2. Indicate lengths/labels for existing and future sight visibility triangles. D.S. 2-02.2.1.10 3. Indicate location, type, size and height of existing and proposed signage if applicable. D.S. 2-02.2.1.13 4. Indicate limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation. D.S. 2-02.2.1.15 5. Indicate drainage patterns, proposed finish floor elevation(s) and finish grades. D.S. 2-02.2.1.16 6. Indicate estimated cut and fill quantities. A grading plan review may be required depending on quantity amount. D.S. 2-02.2.1.17 7. Apply if applicable all easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.1.20 8. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines. All work done in the right-of-way requires Permits & Codes approval. D.S. 2-02.2.1.21 9. Indicate existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. D.S. 2-02.2.1.23 10. Sanitation vehicles should not be required to back-up more than fifty (50) feet. The refuse container enclosure is required to have 10' x 10' inside dimensions. Revise refuse detail with accurate dimensions. D.S. 2-02.2.1.32, D.S. 6-01.4.0 Drainage Report 1. Include a Hydrology/Drainage Report proposing drainage design for the entire project. Indicate limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation. Refer to S.M.D.D.F.M.-2.3 for complete report content and format. 2. Floodplain Use Permit is required. This application can be picked up at Engineering counter, 1st Floor of DSD. |
| 02/21/2003 | BLANCA ESPINO | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | SEE ENGINEERING COMMENTS. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/24/2003 | ELAINE ROSE | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |