Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - T03OT00118
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/10/2003 | James Tate | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: September 10, 2003 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03OT00118 PROJECT NAME: Court and Franklin Development PROJECT ADDRESS: 143 W. Franklin PROJECT REVIEWER: James C. Tate, P.E. The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. Resubmittal required: Site Plan 1. Minimum distance between curb cuts is 12 ft. The two curb cuts on Perry are closer than this. Maximum curb cut width is 35 ft. Relocate the curb cuts. Tucson Code 25.38 2. The plan shows that Buildings 7, 8, and 9 are located in sight-visibility triangles. Relocate the buildings. DS 3-01.5 3. The sight-visibility-triangle (svt) along court does not scale correctly. If drawn correctly, Building 6 will be in the svt. Properly draw the svt and relocate Building 6. 4. The svt at Perry and Franklin does not scale properly. If drawn correctly, Building 7 will be in the svt. Properly draw the svt and relocate Building 7. James C. Tate, P.E. Civil Engineer |
| 09/15/2003 | Peter McLaughlin | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Bob Lanning 922 S. 7th Avenue Tucson, AZ 85701 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T03OT00118 Court and Franklin Development 327 W. King Road TRANSMITTAL: September 16, 2003 1. Buildings may not be situated within site visibility triangles. Portions of Units 7 and 8 are shown to be within SVT's. Also, the stem side of the SVT along North Court Avenue does not scale to 20 feet. If drawn correctly with a 20-foot stem length, it appears that the southwest corner of unit 6 would also fall within this SVT. Please revise plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 DS 3-01.5 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 09/16/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the plans to include the mitigation trees listed on the NPPO application. |
| 09/16/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Applications for projects within the Rio Nuevo and Downtown (RND) Zone shall be reviewed in accordance with Chapter 23A, of the Tucson Code, Sec. 23A-50. The application must include a Design Context and Compatibility Report. Has a report been submitted? 2) Landscaping elements may be placed in the public right-of-way, if the following requirements are met. A. The landscaping is approved by the City Engineer or designee and complies with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. B. All vegetation complies with the requirements of Sec. 3.7.2.2. C. The landscaping does not interfere with the use of the sidewalk. Provide written verification of any approvals received from the City Engineer and/or copies of approved plans. 3) The openings of the refuse enclosure are to be screened in accordance with LUC 3.7.3. 4) The NPPO Application for Exception indicates that 4 native mesquite trees are required for mitigation, revise the landscape plan to include the trees. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/27/2003 | MONICA VALDEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/16/2003 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |