Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - SITE
Permit Number - T03CM05846
Review Name: REVISION - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/27/2004 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | List the screening requirements on the landscape plans. Show the location of all walls and other required screening elements. A 5' wall segment is required to screen parking lot from adjacent office zoned property to the south. Remove note that screens are not required. |
| 04/28/2004 | Loren Makus | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Site, Grading and Drainage review - 1050 E. Milton Rd. DATE: April 30, 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T03CM05846/T03BU03176 SUMMARY: The Engineering Section has reviewed the Drainage Report, Soils Report, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), Site Plan and Grading Plan for the proposed apartments on Milton Road. The site plan and grading plan cannot be approved at this time. The following comments must be addressed in the next submittal. Drainage Report/Soils Report 1. As previously commented, provide percolation tests with the resubmittal. The tests should be performed at the approximate level of the bottom of the proposed basins. Testing shall be performed in accordance with the procedure recommended by the Pima County Department of Transportation and Flood Control District. Use the results to demonstrate that the contents of the basins will percolate into the soil within 12 hours. 2. As previously commented, provide in a soils report a discussion of the proximity of the proposed basin to the proposed structure and pavement locations. Page 4 of the Terracon Geotechnical Engineering Report indicates that "additional foundation movement could occur if water from any source infiltrates the foundation soils; therefore proper drainage should be provided in the final design and during construction. Page 11 specifies that positive drainage should be provided for at least 10 feet from perimeter wall and irrigation should not be performed within 5 feet of foundation walls or pavement. 3. Show that the sidewalks and pedestrian routes adjacent to the Storage/Rec building will be kept flood free for up to the discharge from a 10-year storm event Grading Plan 4. Revise Sections B, C, E, and F to clearly indicate that the entire wall including footing will be within the property boundaries. SWPPP 5. Section 10.1.4 on page 6 of the SWPPP, identifies an operator for the Lakeside Parkway Office/Apartments development. Please identify an operator for this project. 6. Part IV.D.2.c. Describe the practice and schedule to routinely remove offsite accumulation of sediment. 7. Part IV.D.4.c.i. Maintain records of the dates when major grading activities occur. 8. Part IV.D.4.c.ii. Maintain records of when construction activities cease (temporarily or permanently). 9. Part IV.D.4.c.iii. Maintain records of when stabilization is initiated and completed and any reason for delays. 10. Part IV.D.4.c. Describe record keeping efforts; include forms/checklists used for keeping the required data. 11. Part IV.H.1. Indicate that the inspection frequency is to be at least once every 7 calendar days or Indicate that the inspection frequency is to be at least once every 14 days and also within 24 hours of the end of each storm event of equal to or greater than 0.5 inches Resubmittal will require a revised Site Plan, Soils Report, SWPPP, Drainage Report and Grading Plan addressing all items listed above. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov Loren Makus, E.I.T. Sr. Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 05/03/2004 | Peter McLaughlin | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Metro Permit Express 1001 N. Alvernon Way #105 Tucson, AZ 85711 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T03CM05845 Milton Apartments 1050 E. Milton Road TRANSMITTAL: May 3, 2004 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Clarify the building setback provided to the south property line. The setback distance given on the drawing is not the same as that shown in the setback table. LUC 3.2.6.4 2. This lot is made up of two lots, one being a portion of a lot. All approved lot split documents must be provided to the zoning review section for the split on the western lot portion. Also, provide lot combination documents including Assessor's lot combo docs and notarized/recorded covenant. Revise legal description to be correct and include the westernmost portion of the site. 3. Revise scale in location map to be correct. 4. Revise on the drawing the dimensioned building setback to east property line to be the same as the proposed height of parapet (20'-10"). Luc 3.2.6.4 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 05/03/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/05/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/04/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |