Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T03CM05687
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/16/2004 | Raul Palma | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/18/2004 | Linda Buczynski | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. Show location of Panel LS. This comment was made on the first submittal. Unresponsive. 2. "Provide Panel Schedule for Panel LS." This comment was made on the first submittal. Unresponsive. 3. "Size of MBJ shall be no smaller than 1/0 per NEC 250-102 (c) and Table 250-66. Please correct from #2." This comment was made on the first submittal. Unresponsive. 4. "Service Entrance Section is only indicated for a Panel HSN1, which is not on this project. Provide a line diagram of the service powering panels HPS and LS. Provide load calculations for any service(s) powering the two panels involved in this project. Clarify on the site plan specifically which service(s) powers both panels involved in this project." This comment was made on the first submittal. Unresponsive. 5. "Provide fault calculations for all relevant points of the electrical system." This comment was made on the first submittal. Unresponsive. 6. There was not response letter filed with the current submittal. Please feel free to forward such letter directly to the above email address. |
| 06/29/2004 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | June 29, 2004 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments: Zoning has reviewed but cannot approve the proposed plans at this time. The approved development plan inicates the proposed screen walls, location, and height as well as the materials and colors. The plan submitted for review and approval for the screen walls and freestanding lighting matches the development plan for placement of screen walls, colors and materials but also indicates that the existing site wall at the corner of the site is to be modified. The exisitng wall was not part of the review and approval on the development plan and therefore the site wall and lighting plans cannot be approved while the exisitng wall is part of this permit. The modifcation of the exisitng wall must be done by separate permit and must have a separate scenic corridor review and approval. If references and the drawings related to the modification of the existing wall are removed from the submittal packet, the new screen walls and freestanding lighting plans can be approved over the counter by the Zoning reviewer when the plans are re-submitted for review. If you have any questions related to these comments or if the applicant wishes to remove the references and drawings related to the existing modifications please contact me or Patricia Gehlen for more information. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/30/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |