Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T03CM05687
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
01/05/2004 | Loren Makus | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
12/17/2003 | Linda Buczynski | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. Show location of Panel LS on Site Lighting Plan. 2. Provide Panel Schedule for Panel LS. 3. Provide calculations for the light pole and foundation. The detail on Sheet E0.3 depicts a 22' high pole. Structural calculations are a requirement for poles over 20' in height. 4. Regarding Keynotes 1 and 2 on Sheet E0.2, clarify why electrical conduit needs to be run to the gas pad. If any electrical work is to be performed in a Classified Location according to Chapter 5 of the NEC, show the limits of such Location on the plans and provide seal-offs and any other Code-required provisions. 5. Indicate depth of conduit fill, per NEC Table 300-5. 6. Size of MBJ shall be no smaller than 1/0 per NEC 250-102 (c) and Table 250-66. Please correct from #2. 7. Service Entrance Section is only indicated for a Panel HSN1, which is not on this project. Provide a line diagram of the service powering panels HPS and LS. Provide load calculations for any service(s) powering the two panels involved in this project. Clarify on the site plan specifically which service(s) powers both panels involved in this project. 8. Provide fault calculations for all relevant points of the electrical system. |
12/24/2003 | RAUL PALMA | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | City of Tucson, Development Services BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL COMMENTS 1) Specify size and number of rebar in footing, shown on sheet SP-3 details 6 and 7. 2) Sheet SP-3, details 6and 7, shows 2'-max and the other shows 2'-6" max of concrete base above finish grade. Which is correct? Clarify! 3) Sheets EO.3, S-1, and SP-3, show a pole and foundation, specify which one will be used and void or delete the rest. 4) Special inspection required for the masonry in the retaining walls. |
12/29/2003 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1. Fire approval for site lighting and retaining walls only. 2. Required fire hydrants must be installed, operational and accessible before combustibles are stored on site. 3. Separate permits and submittals required for underground fire sprinkler piping from City easement to building. |
12/31/2003 | Patricia Gehlen | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning 12/31/2003 Copies of the approved development plan are required prior to review and approval. |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
01/15/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
01/09/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | REJECT SHELF | Completed |