Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T03CM05687
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
10249 E RITA RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T03CM05687
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/05/2004 Loren Makus ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
12/17/2003 Linda Buczynski ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1. Show location of Panel LS on Site Lighting Plan.
2. Provide Panel Schedule for Panel LS.
3. Provide calculations for the light pole and foundation. The detail on Sheet E0.3 depicts a 22' high pole. Structural calculations are a requirement for poles over 20' in height.
4. Regarding Keynotes 1 and 2 on Sheet E0.2, clarify why electrical conduit needs to be run to the gas pad. If any electrical work is to be performed in a Classified Location according to Chapter 5 of the NEC, show the limits of such Location on the plans and provide seal-offs and any other Code-required provisions.
5. Indicate depth of conduit fill, per NEC Table 300-5.
6. Size of MBJ shall be no smaller than 1/0 per NEC 250-102 (c) and Table 250-66. Please correct from #2.
7. Service Entrance Section is only indicated for a Panel HSN1, which is not on this project. Provide a line diagram of the service powering panels HPS and LS. Provide load calculations for any service(s) powering the two panels involved in this project. Clarify on the site plan specifically which service(s) powers both panels involved in this project.
8. Provide fault calculations for all relevant points of the electrical system.
12/24/2003 RAUL PALMA BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied City of Tucson, Development Services
BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL COMMENTS

1) Specify size and number of rebar in footing, shown on sheet SP-3 details
6 and 7.
2) Sheet SP-3, details 6and 7, shows 2'-max and the other shows 2'-6" max
of concrete base above finish grade. Which is correct? Clarify!
3) Sheets EO.3, S-1, and SP-3, show a pole and foundation, specify which one will be used and void or delete the rest.
4) Special inspection required for the masonry in the retaining walls.
12/29/2003 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approv-Cond 1. Fire approval for site lighting and retaining walls only.
2. Required fire hydrants must be installed, operational and accessible before combustibles are stored on site.
3. Separate permits and submittals required for underground fire sprinkler piping from City easement to building.
12/31/2003 Patricia Gehlen ZONING REVIEW Denied Zoning
12/31/2003
Copies of the approved development plan are required prior to review and approval.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/15/2004 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
01/09/2004 TAMI ACHONG REJECT SHELF Completed