Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - SITE
Permit Number - T03CM05655
Review Name: REVISION - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/22/2004 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Fire approval for site revisions only. |
| 09/27/2004 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the phasing, NPP, and landscape included in the development plan Case # D03-0038 to match the grading limits indicted in the plan revision page C1.0. |
| 09/27/2004 | Andrew Connor | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the phasing, NPP, and landscape included in the development plan Case # D03-0038 to match the grading limits indicted in the plan revision page C1.0 per DS 2-07.2.2.B.4 |
| 10/11/2004 | Loren Makus | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/13/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See zoning comments. |
| 10/13/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Metro Permit Express 1001 N. Alvernon Way #105 Tucson, AZ 85711 (520) 977-7187 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner Development Services Dept. PROJECT: T03CM005655 Tucson Medical Center Site Revision (reference: D04-038) TRANSMITTAL: October 13, 2004 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This project is a minor revision to development plan. Submit three copies of the revised development plan to the CDRC office with an explanation as to why the revision is proposed. was reviewed as a change of use. DS 2-02 2. As stated in the loading zone calculations on the development plan, a total of 5 loading spaces are required and provided with both phases of development. But with the proposed site revision, one of the loading zones appears to be removed. Revise plan to show all required loading zones. Also, since parking lot configuration is changing provide all other calculations, such as vehicle parking (standard and handicapped) and bicycle parking for future phase build out of development. DS 2-02.2.2.B If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/19/2004 | BETH GRANT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/19/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |