Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T03CM05574
Review Name: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/19/2004 | STANTEC | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this review covers Architectural, Structural, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittal provided. All portions of the project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. GENERAL: q There are no general comments to be addressed. ARCHITECTURAL: q Check the hardware schedules. Some of the doors indicated as receiving special hardware on the plans are not indicated as such on the door schedule. Please coordinate. A review of the Sheets E-3 and E-4 makes the locations of keypads more clear (i.e. the hardware on egress doors cannot require any special knowledge [2000 IBC Sec. 1003.3.1.8]). This previous comment has not been addressed. Specifically, doors 101B and 243 are indicated to have a sign indicating that these exit doors are to remain unlocked during business hours. The exception that allows such a sign is for "main exterior doors" and not for a door along a corridor that egresses into an exit stair. At doors 101B and 243, is the keypad must be for entry and not exit. Doors 101A, 201B, are signed as exits as well, so they also cannot have a keypad required to exit. Please correct. q The corridor that serves the building south of the southern most exit stair is a dead end corridor. As such it is limited to 50 feet (considering there is a sprinkler system) [2000 IBC Sec. 1004.3.2.3]. The dead end is currently 65 feet long. Please correct. This previous comment has not been addressed. See the attached diagram for clarification regarding this comment. STRUCTURAL: q There are no structural comments to be addressed. MECHANICAL: q There are no mechanical comments to be addressed. PLUMBING: q There are no plumbing comments to be addressed ELECTRICAL: q There are no electrical comments to be addressed. -End of Review |
| 01/20/2004 | EROSE1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 01/20/2004 | EROSE1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/20/2004 | EROSE1 | WATER | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/20/2004 | ELAINE ROSE | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |