Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T03CM05433
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/03/2004 | Andrew Connor | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A 5' wall is required to screen the vehicle use areas from adjacent residential properties Walls must be of masonry material or masonry with a stucco or textured finish per LUC 3.7.3.7.A.1 Slatted fence will not comply with code. 2. Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property and a signed statement that indicates Protected Native Plants are not located on the subject site. Photographs and Application for Exception are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C |
| 09/03/2004 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: September 3, 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM05433 PROJECT NAME: Yapavai Apartments PROJECT ADDRESS: 344 East Yapavai Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. Comments in bold and italicized are comments from the 1st submittal. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN 1. Add a general note to the site plan stating that all drainage information, finish grades and spot elevation can be found on the grading plan sheet C-1. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 2. The request for the variance to reduce the PAAL from 24' to 20' must be approved prior to site plan approval. Submit the letter of approval from the Board of Adjustments and include on the site plan the case number, date of approval, variances granted and any conditions imposed on the development. Until the letter of approval from the Board of Adjustments is submitted and the case number is added to the plan the above comment will continue to be made. 3. A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. The refuge area may have a roof for shade, provided it contains a sidewalk and pedestrian access which is unobstructed and is set back one (1) foot from the PAAL. Sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located. Provide a sidewalk and pedestrian refuge between existing drive and existing fourplex. Revise plan as necessary. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1., Figure 1 and DS 2-08.4.1.B. Until the letter of approval from the Board of Adjustments is submitted and the case number is added to the plan the above comment will continue to be made. 4. The response to comment number 7 ( Engineering comment made July 14th) is not acceptable. Per DS 2-02.2.1.A.23., the site plan must have existing spot elevations and the Bench Mark based on City Tucson Datum with the City Field Book and page number. The City of Tucson Dept. of Transportation (TDOT) has this information online and available to public on a walk in basis on the 3rd floor of the Public Works Building. The web address is http://dot.ci.tucson.az.us/mapcenter/. Revise all the spot elevations and add Bench Mark with City Book and Page. 5. It is acknowledged that a symbol of the wall openings has been added to the legend. However it is not clear where the location of the wall openings are on the wall. Clearly indicate on the site plan where the wall openings are located. |
| 09/03/2004 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property and a signed statement that indicates Protected Native Plants are not located on the subject site. Photographs and Application for Exception are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C |
| 10/04/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSC TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T03CM05433 344 E Yavapai Road Multi Family Development New Triplex Site Plan Transmittal date: 3rd Review October 4, 2004 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. Resubmit for Zoning Review the redline copies of the site plan and additional documents requested with the revised site plan submittal. 1. It is acknowledged that a Board of Adjust variance will be sought for the width of the PAAL, five foot pedestrian refuge area with a four foot wide sidewalk, and for the additional two-foot separation between the PAAL and the fence along the north west boundary of the site. Please be aware that Board of adjustment variances are not approved unless hardship can be demonstrated. With regards to the application to the Board of Adjustment for variances related to land use code requirements and/or criteria the following may be used to complete the variance requests on the application. The Board of Adjustments may address or consider only land use code requirements. Any items a that are found in the development standards code manual and compliance cannot be met must be considered by the CDRC Review Committee for a development standard modification request or the development standard item must relate to LUC code requirement for Board of Adjustment variance consideration. I have done my best to find in the land use code the section that relates to the items that are not specifically a land use code requirement but are linked. If upon review of the final Zoning comments for board of adjustment variance consideration, DSD staff finds that certain development items do not meet the criteria for a board of adjust variance consideration the applicant must apply for a DSMR (development standard modification request). a. The PAAL area for two-way traffic with parking stalls at a 90 degree angle/perpendicular to the PAAL must be meet the minimum of 24 feet width. The land use code section reference for this requirement is LUC section table 3.3.7-I (Motor Vehicle Area Dimensions). b. The required width of the PAAL has been provided in comment 8.a. In addition to the width of the PAAL, a minimum distance of two (2) feet must be maintained between a PAAL and any wall, screen, or other obstruction, provided pedestrian activity is directed to another location. The additional area is necessary to provide clearance for fire, sanitation, and delivery vehicles. The section of the land use code that relates to this development standard is in LUC section 3.2.8.2.C and 3.8.2.3.A. c. The five-foot pedestrian refuge area required between the PAAL and the existing enclosed structures is a development standard found under development standards 3-05.2.2.B.1. Also the sidewalk is a requirement of development standards 2-08.4.1.A. The sidewalk is to provide a continuous pedestrian path from the street sidewalk to all elements of the development as listed in development standards 2-08. The sidewalk has been provided along the east side of the of existing building and therefore the variance for this section would be to provide the five-foot wide sidewalk along the east side of the property as depicted on the site plan. The land use code section that relates to the this item is LUC section 3.2.8.4.B (Previous Comment: All approvals such as LDO, B. of A. variances must be listed on the plan. The case number, date of approval and conditions of approval must be listed. Copies of the approval letters must accompany the next site plan submittal. DS 2-02.2.1.A.38) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/11/2004 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/11/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |