Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T03CM05410
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/21/2004 | Robert Sherry | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the site drawing on sheet P1.1 to show the size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. 2. Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building sewer. Show that the building sewer complies with Section 719.0, UPC 1994. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. 3. Provide a fixture description for the water closet. The model number shown for the new fixture is for a flush valve, not a water closet. Show the minimum operating pressure for the new water closet. Reference Section 401.1, UPC 1994. |
| 01/21/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the submitted energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope as required. The envelope compliance statement indicates "UNKNOWN (insufficient data)". Reference Section 101.2, International Energy Conservation Code 1998. 2. Revise the ventilation calculations using the occupant loads from Table 403.3, IMC 2000. Reference Section 403, IMC 2000. 3. Revise the smoke detector note on sheet M-2 to indicate that the required smoke detectors are to be located in the return ducts. |
| 01/23/2004 | RAUL PALMA | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/02/2004 | Patricia Gehlen | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning 2/2/2004 1) Two complete sets of the approved development and landscape plans must be included in the submittal package (one for each set of the building plans). A Yellow site card and routing must also be provided, 2) The proposed exterior colors show on sheet A2.1 of the building drawings do not match the SCZ colors approved on the development plan, 3) The square footage of the building on the building plans is larger than the square footage of the building on the development plan. Revise one or the other for consistency. |
| 02/02/2004 | Linda Buczynski | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/04/2004 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | Need to show location/method of connection to public sewer. May need to build on-site private sewer for Eastpoint Commercial Center (with DEQ review/approval). Need copy of on-site private sewer - manhole or tap permit? |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/05/2004 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/04/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |