Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-REVISION/OTHER
Permit Number - T03CM05364
Review Name: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-REVISION/OTHER
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/08/2004 | STANTEC | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Plan review for the above-referenced project has been completed, per the 2000 IBC and IMC, 1998 IECC and ICC/ANSI A117.1, 1999 NEC, with all local amendments and the 1994 UPC with Arizona State Amendments. This letter reflects comments to be addressed with a written response to each of the noted items indicating the action taken. In order to facilitate a shorter back-check time, we request that you please provide revised plans and calculations, highlighting any changes that have been made. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this review covers Architectural, Structural, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittal provided. All portions of the project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. GENERAL: There are no general comments to be addressed. ARCHITECTURAL: Based on the area of the lower floor (5, 337 s.f.) and the occupant load (office = 100 s.f. per person) two exits are required [2000 IBC Sec. 1004.2.1]. There were multiple "exits" from the first floor evenly distributed around the perimeter, however now there are only two exits shown for the first floor on Sheet A1.1. These two exits are too close to one another and need to be at least 1/3rd of the overall diagonal dimension of the building apart based on the building being sprinkled [2000 IBC Sec. 1004.2.2.1]. The guards show on the east and west elevations for the upper balconies have changed their appearance. Was this intended? Has the design of these guards changed? Please clarify. They are still noted as wire mesh, however they look like solid brick (and completely open in some instances with no protection). STRUCTURAL: There are no structural comments to be addressed. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/08/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |