Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T03CM05308
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/02/2004 | Robert Sherry | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The manufacturer's literature for the specified water heater (Takagi TK2) indicates an input of 185,000 BTUH and a maximum capacity of 5.7 GPM with a 60-degree temperature rise. Revise combustion air calculations, gas calculations and pipe sizes as required (Note that the longest pipe run is to AC-1, approximately 90 feet). Show how the specified water heater can supply the required hot water demand to meet the Pima County Health Department requirements. Reference Sections 1216.2 and 101.5.2, UPC 1994. 2. The indirect waste drain from the storage bin of an ice machine may not be combined with the cooling coil condensate drain (see detail 9/P-4.0). Reference Sections 801.2 and 803.0, UPC 1994. |
| 01/02/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide complete structural calculations to show that the Type I hoods are adequately supported. Include connection details on drawing and resolve the conflicting hanger information shown on M-3.0 and M-3.1. Note that Section 507.6 requires the possible weight of personnel working on or in the hood to be included in the calculations. Reference Section 507.6, IMC 2000. |
| 01/09/2004 | Martin Haeberle | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Occupancy classification is an A-2 not an M. Revise plan Was not done on resubmitted plans. 2. Provide structural analysis of proposed hood attachment to existing roof system. Calculations do not reflect weight of hood. See mechanical comments. In addition, plans need to reflect design criteria of the structural calculations. |
| 01/15/2004 | Linda Buczynski | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. Sheet E1.0 1. Panel B Circuits 25, 28 and 30 have 20A signs. Considering continuous load, this is too high a load for a single 20A Circuit, and the VA is well undercounted as well (20) (120) =2400 .1200. Please correct panel schedules, and rework new totals on panel schedules, since there already has been uncounted additional load after the initial submittal Sheet E3.0 1. According to Keynote 2, Walk-in Cooler Unit on Circuit B-33,35 and Freezer on B-37,39 shall be fused. Disconnect is unfused on Roof Power Plan. Please eliminate the "NF" designation from the Roof Power Plan for these two pieces of equipment, as this is in conflict with Detail 1 on the same sheet, and as this equipment needs overload protection. |
| 01/16/2004 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/20/2004 | Paul Machado | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/21/2004 | MONICA VALDEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/20/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |