Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - T03CM05176
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/08/2004 | Peter McLaughlin | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Arquitecto E. J. Ornelas 100 N. Stone Ave #1002 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 624-8102 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner Development Services Dept FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner Development Services Dept. PROJECT: T03CM05176 Moreliana Fruit Bars 145 W. Ajo Way Site Plan Review (2nd review) TRANSMITTAL: January 12, 2004 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Revise the maximum slope of the handicapped access aisles to be 1:48 per ANS 502.4. The proposed ramp is OK at 1:12 slope as indicated. ANS 2. The shading of the vehicular use area and crosswalk is too dark to read the underlying text. Please remove or lighten shading. Also, the text within this area and elsewhere on the plan does not consistently meet the minimum standard of 12 point (0.12") for archiving / microfilming purposes. Revise type to meet minimum size. 3. The response comment states that there are no paved areas around the sides of the proposed building but keynote 12, which points to the east, west and south sides, states that it is paved with chip seal. Please revise to be consistent and clarify the use of this paved area. The 10-foot width of pavement does not provide the required minimum for a one-way PAAL. DS 2-02.2.1.A.31 LUC 2.5.4.2.B.6 4. Areas that are striped pedestrian paths which are not cross-walks must be made of concrete and be physically separated from adjacent PAALs/vehicle use area by use of raised concrete curbing except at crosswalks. A 3/4-inch vertical separation as indicated in the response comments does not meet requirement for physical separation. A 6" vertical separation is required. This physical separation also serves as a backup spur to prevent vehicles from backing into the pedestrian route as they maneuver to exit the site front end first as required by code. Revise pedestrian sidewalk (keynote 11) adjacent to the water harvesting area along the east property line to show physical separation. DS 2-08.4.1 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. PMc\siteplans03\T03CM05176b |
| 01/12/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See zoning review comments |
| 01/13/2004 | Joseph Linville | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The planting plans do not match on the plans submitted. One sheet includes plantings and the other does not. Revise as necessary. 2) The required screening along the street frontage cannot exceed thirty inches in height if located within the sight visibility triangles. Revise the plan to locate Lleucophyllum frutescens outside of the site visibility triangle or specify Lleucophyllum frutescens "Thunder Cloud" or Lleucophyllum zygophyllum. LUC 3.7.3.4 3) Plant used for screening are required to be a minimum of five-gallon size. DS 2-06.3.5.A 4) A barrier is required at the perimeter of the vehicular use area. DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 Show curbing on the plan along the east side of the vehicular use area. 5) Revise the arrow for the call-out for the required screen wall along the south property line at the easement line to point to the correct location. DS 2-06.3.7.C |
| 01/14/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception. |
| 01/16/2004 | Doug Williams | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |