Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T03CM05176
Parcel: 120070300

Address:
145 W AJO WY

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T03CM05176
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/12/2003 Doug Williams ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Site Review - 145 W. Ajo Way
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 1 December 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM05176

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the Drainage Report and Site Plan received on October 31, 2003. Approvals are not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

SITE PLAN
1. Provide the proposed buildings lowest (finished) floor elevation and finished site grades on the plan (Development Standard -DS- 2-02.2.1.16).
2. Provide estimated cut/fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1.17).
3. Depict full right of way dimensioning for Ajo Way, including the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) plan right of way dimensioning (DS 2-02.2.1.19).
4. Dimension and label from street monument line(s) to existing and future curb, sidewalk, and utility locations (DS 2-02.2.1.21).
5. Depict/provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding 2 feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number (DS 2-02.2.1.23).
6. Demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, in accordance with the City of Tucson Land Use Code, section 3.7.4.3 B;
7. Depict the refuse container location, size and access thereto fully dimensioned, in accordance with DS 2-02.2.1.32. A centralized onsite refuse provision is required for all commercial developments, in accordance with DS 6-01.3.0. (Please provide written authorization with clear indication of approved alternative, if any, from Environmental Services Department if an alternative pick-up procedure has been approved).
8. Depict roof drainage arrows with downspout locations indicated, and depict/label sidewalk scuppers for conveyance under sidewalk areas (DS 2-08.4.1 E & 3-01.4.4 F).

DRAINAGE REPORT:

1. The Q100 calculated and discussed in the report does not coincide with Tucson Department of Transportation mapped watercourse data, available online at: http://tdotmaps.transview.org/mapguide_mwf_tdot.htm. Please revise the report as necessary, demonstrating compatibility with mapped watercourse data.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Doug Williams
Sr. Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
12/02/2003 Peter McLaughlin ZONING REVIEW Denied SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL

TO: Arquitecto E. J. Ornelas
100 N. Stone Ave #1002
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 624-8102

From: Peter McLaughlin
Senior Planner
Development Services Department

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner
Development Services Dept.

PROJECT:
T03CM05176
Moreliana Fruit Bars
145 W. Ajo Way
Site Plan Review (1st review)

TRANSMITTAL: December 3, 2003

COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This project was reviewed as a new use. Full code compliance is required.
DS 2-02

2. Revise the max slope of the handicapped ramp and access aisles to be 1:12.
ANS/ IBC

3. Add a note stating the existing use of the property. Aerial photos show that at least two buildings have recently been existing on the property. If they are still existing, show their location with a dashed line and label them "to be removed". If they have been removed provide a note stating that the existing use of the property is vacant.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.31

4. Please clarify the use of the paved area in the back and along the sides of the proposed building. The 10-foot width of pavement does not provide the required minimum for a one-way PAAL.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.31
LUC 2.5.4.2.B.6

5. Show the layout of any proposed freestanding lighting.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.25

6. Please add any existing and proposed easements and their recordation information (docket and page reference numbers) to the site plan.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.20

7. Show the location, size and height of any proposed freestanding signage. Also, indicate if any billboards exist on the site.
DS 2-02.2.1.13

8. Areas that are striped pedestrian paths which are not cross-walks must be made of concrete and be physically separated from adjacent PAALs/vehicle use area by use of raised concrete curbing except at crosswalks. Please revise pedestrian sidewalk (keynote 11) adjacent to the water harvesting area along the east property lines to show physical separation. DS 2-08.4.1

9. Revise the proposed floor area ratio (FAR) calculation to be correct. The FAR is calculated as the building gross floor area รท site area. In this case, with a 720 square foot building proposed on a 6,825 square foot lot, the proposed FAR calculates to 0.11.
DS 2-02.2.2.A

10. There must be no white-out corrections on the approved site plan. When all corrections have been made, please submit a copy without white-out corrections.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.32

11. Place a note on the plan stating that the project is designed to meet the criteria of Sec. 2.8.3, MS&R setback zone. LUC 2.8.3


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.
12/03/2003 PETER MCLAUGHLIN HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied See zoning review comments.
12/04/2003 Joseph Linville LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Revise Detail C on Sheet1.

2) Note that decomposed granite will also be placed in the unpaved area within the electric easement.

3) Screening per LUC Table 3.7.2.-I is required along the street frontage, behind or at the back of the street landscape border.

4) Landscaping must comply with SVT requirements. Revise the plans to relocate shrubs or accents which may exceed 30" in height outside of sight visibility triangles. LUC 3.7.3.4

5) A barrier is required at the perimeter of the vehicular use area. DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 Provide curbing where paved areas abut non paved areas, leaving openings for water harvesting.

6) Revise the landscape plan to "indicate use of
all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area". LUC 3.7.4.3.B

7) Revise the landscape border calculations to list the correct number of each species shown on the plan.
DS 2-07.2.2

8) Show the refuse storage area on the site plan and providing provide screening to comply with LUC Table 3.7.2-I.

9) If the landscaping is to be installed as shown at this time change the call out to remove the word "future". LUC 2.8.3.5
The landscaping is required to located based on the MS&R right-of-way.

10) Revise the plans to locate the required screen wall along the south property line at the easement line. DS 2-06.3.7.C

11) A native plant preservation plan is required LUC 3.8
12/04/2003 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied 1) A native plant preservation plan is required. LUC 3.8
12/05/2003 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/08/2003 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/05/2003 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed