Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T03CM05031
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/09/2004 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSC TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T03CM05031 Jim Barnes Construction Material Sales Construction Material Sales Site Plan Transmittal date: 1st Review February 11, 2004 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The proposed development is an expansion of building are and is subject to full code compliance for the use. The development is on an existing pad, which is part of a larger development. It is not clear if the proposed use was originally included in or if the use is other than was approved as part of the master development plan. Please provide a copy of the COT approved master development/site plan with the next submittal. 2. Add the street and label the street name "Sarnoff Drive" and "Pantano Parkway" on the location map. Also please show and label the Pantano Wash. DS 2-02.2.1.A.4 3. Based on the square footage of the modular building, the required number of vehicle parking spaces has been provided. What cannot be determined at this time is whether additional parking spaces may be required based for the outside display area. Please clarify if outside display and storage is proposed. Also if either is proposed the display and storage areas must be defined, labeled and dimensioned on the plan. Additional parking may be required. At least one of the vehicle-parking spaces must be handicapped. The handicapped space must be van accessible which means that the access aisle for the space must be eight (8) feet wide. Per the plan the plan a handicapped space of 12 feet which includes an access aisle has been provided but does not meet the minimum width requirements. Revise the handicap space, label and dimension. Dimension the width of the PAAL between the proposed development and the development to the east. The PAAL must be a minimum of 24 feet wide for two-way traffic. DS 2-02.2.1.A.8 4. This plan must demonstrate how the pedestrian circulation connects to the existing onsite circulation. Accessible ramps must be shown at key locations where the sidewalk and PAALs intersect. Crosswalks that connect the sidewalks must be shown, dimensioned and labeled. The sidewalks must connect with the developments to the east and to the south within the Autocare development. In addition the accessible ramps must be clearly shown and labeled on the plan. The accessible ramp from the onsite sidewalk to the modular structure must be shown, dimensioned and labeled. An accessible ramp is also required from the handicap parking space access aisle to the pedestrian sidewalk. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 5. If applicable, indicate the locations, type, and size of any existing or proposed freestanding signage including billboards on the pad site. DS 2-02.2.1A.13 6. If applicable, indicate the location and type of existing or proposed freestanding lighting. DS 2-02.2.1.A.25 7. The existing and future right of way lines curbs and sidewalks must be shown on the plan. The right of way width and curb to property line dimensions must be labeled. DS 2-02.2.1.A.18 and .19 8. Revise the zoning classifications for the parcels adjacent to the west and east of the property. To the west the zoning is C-2 and to the east the zoning is C-3. DS 2-02.2.1.A.28 9. List the existing uses on the site. Also please add to the Construction Sales use note the development designator "31". DS 2-02.2.1.A.31 10. List what the existing and proposed floor area and floor area ratio is and will be with the building expansion. DS 2-02.2.2A.2 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and landscape plan and requested documents |
| 02/12/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See zoning comments |
| 02/13/2004 | Andrew Connor | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Provide a barrier at the perimeter of the loading area to prevent vehicles from driving onto unpaved portions of the site. DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 2) Revise the plan to provide a dust control treatment for unpaved portions of the site. LUC 3.7.2.7. 3) Provide a six-foot high screen on all sides of the refuse storage area. Gates must provide an opaque screen. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 4) Revise the plans as requested by other agencies and submit any revised plans. |
| 02/13/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception per 2002 PC aerial photo. |
| 02/23/2004 | Loren Makus | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: February 23, 2004 TO: Mr. Gary Robison SUBJECT: Site Plan Sales Trailer REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM05031 SUMMARY: The Site Plan was reviewed by Development Services Department, Engineering Division on February 23, 2004. The site plan was not approved. Please address the following comments. Site Plan Comments: 1. Clarify whether the area to be developed will be a separate parcel from the larger parcel that currently exists. If a land division is to occur, additional comments may be made. 2. Provide an estimate of the cut and fill quantities for the proposed project. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. 3. Dimension existing and future Major Streets and Routes right of way and sight visibility triangles. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19 4. Show 100-year water surface elevation and ponding limits for the existing retention basin. DS 2-02.2.1.A.15 5. Provide dimensions and bearings for all parcel boundaries and describe the basis of bearing. 2-02.2.1.A.5 6. Show accessibility and maneuverability to the solid waste container location and provide full dimensioning. DS 2-02.2.1.A.32 7. Revise the solid waste enclosure detail so that it clearly provide internal clear dimensions of 10' by 10'. DS 6.014.2.c Revise the Site Plan to address all of these comments and resubmit two copies for review. Include a letter explaining how each comment has been addressed. When the site plan is approved, submit application for a grading permit, if it is determined to be necessary. Loren Makus Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 02/27/2004 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/01/2004 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/27/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |