Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T03CM04982
Parcel: 131070650

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T03CM04982
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/06/2003 MELISSA POULIN WWM REVIEW Denied Bldg 1 - Jim Click Ford Dealership - includes central plant enclosure 4"CS and Bldg 2 - Car wash.
Needs WW/WC Tom Tomchak review of sand/oil interceptor - 579-5771
Needs WW review of connection to public sewer and review of status of existing on-site public sewer-8th floor - 740-6500
Needs WW/review of credit if applicable (no demo drawings) non-par unless WW reviews differently.
11/13/2003 Robert Sherry MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide auxiliary drain pans or secondary drain systems for fan coil units suspended above ceilings. Reference Section 307.2.3 IMC.
2. Show size, routing, and termination of condensate drain for FC-1. Reference Section 307.2, IMC 2000 and Section 807.2, UPC 1994.
3. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference Section 401, IMC 2000.
4. Provide smoke detectors in the return air duct, upstream of any outside air connections, for all air distribution systems with a capacity greater than 2,000 CFM. Reference Section 606.1, IMC 2000.
5. Revise hydronic supply piping to eliminate prohibited tee applications. Reference Section 1206.1.1, IMC 2000.
6. Provide a means to drain the hydronic piping system. Reference Section 1206.2, IMC 2000.
7. Provide information to show that the dishwasher being installed in the Snack Area does not require a Type II hood. Reference Section 507.2, IMC 2000.
11/13/2003 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Include all fixtures (e.g. hose bibbs) when calculating the total demand and determining pipe sizes. Diversity is already included in the fixture unit calculations. Reference Section 610.1, UPC 1994.
2. Calculate the water demand using the fixture units shown in Tables 6-3 or A-2. A wash sink is rated at 2 fixture units (water) per set of faucets. Reference Section 610.3, UPC 1994.
3. Determine the water demand load using chart A2 or Chart A3 (the Hunter curves), UPC 1994.
4. Provide calculations to show that coincident demand from the fluid cooler (automatic operation) and the emergency shower will not cause inadequate performance of the emergency shower.
5. Correct the equivalent length used to calculate the allowable friction losses to match the equivalent length from the Pipe Length calculation. Revise the pipe sizes as required.
6. Termination of the excess pressure relief from the water heater over a service sink or mop sink is not an approved location. Reference Section 608.5, UPC 1994.
7. Revise the design of the drainage system shown in detail 1/P2.3 to conform to Section 910.0, UPC 1994.
8. Coordinate the plumbing plan shown on sheet P2.2 and the detail 1/P2.3. Provide cleanouts as required by Section 707.4, UPC 1994.
9. Appliances to be directly connected to the water supply system (e.g. ice machine, coffee brewers, and espresso machine) that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps may require reduced pressure principle backflow preventers. Please submit equipment sheets for determination. Reference Section 603.0, UPC 1994.
10. Provide information on how the dishwasher is to be drained. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
11. Provide drinking fountains as required by Table 2902.1, IBC 2000.
11/13/2003 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
11/17/2003 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved To: Robert W. Bollin 29802 Avenida De Las Banderas Rancho Santa Margarita, California, 92688
SUBJECT: 6216 E. 22nd Street
Site plan T03CM04982 (First Review)
T14S, R14E, Section 24

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Report.

The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Site Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies with resubmittal.
2. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
3. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5
4. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10.
5. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12.
6. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14.
7. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.
8. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
9. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19.
10. Intersection widening is required for Wilmot Road per Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19.
11. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the SP. See attached sheet.
12. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
13. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23.
14. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27.
15. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0.
16. Please provide adjacent property grades for review in accordance with in 2000 IBC section 13 concerning fills.
17. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
18. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
19. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.
20. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".

Drainage Report:
1. The DR review was done for site plan purposes only, the final acceptance is granted along with the grading plan.
2. Please provide details of the landscaped areas and drainage features (pipes) to be used for retention/detention basins along 22nd Street for review.
3. Please note that no retention/detention basins are allowed in the public right-of-way.
4. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR and maintenance check list, see attached.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1193 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
11/25/2003 Linda Buczynski ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

Sheet E-1
1. In Keynotes 6, 7, 9 & 10, specify that the combination starter shall have overload protection, sized per manufacturer's recommendations.
2. Provide individual disconnects for the individual single-phase gate motors on LA4-37,39,41, per NEC 430-102.
3. Home run indicates Circuit 11,13, Circuit 15,17, and Circuit 19,21. Circuits are actually Circuit 13,15, Circuit 17,19, and Circuit 21,23. Re-check all such work on this Sheet.

Sheet E-3
1. Note 4d refers to NEC 620-72. There is no NEC 620-72.
2. Clarify the intent regarding the series rating of the panels. For example, Panels HB and HC are electrically and physically in the same proximity to the MSB; however, HB has a straight rating of 65,000 AIC, whereas HC is series rated 65,000 AIC. This combined with the wording in Note 1 could lead to differences in interpretation. Furthermore, Section 2.3 of the Specifications Sheet E-16 call out for CBs rated 100,000 at 480V, UNO. In all cases, specify the AIC rating of all OCPDs in switchgear, distribution gear, panels main and branch circuit CBs. For series rated devices, specify the higher and lower ratings, such as 65/10 K, and to which devices these ratings pertain. If necessary, provide AFC at requisite parts of the system, and show calculations.
3. Regarding Note 5, it is not the responsibility of the Contractor to determine if motor loads in conjunction with series ratings would violate. Please perform this analysis with the design, and provide for fully rated panels, as necessary.
4. Feeder to Panel LB6, 3/0, ampacity 200A. Not protected by a 225A CB.
5. Feeder to Panel LB6, #6 GND, per Table 250-122, is too small on load side of 225A OCPD.
6. Eliminate the #3 GND in the Service Entrance Conductor run, as it introduces a parallel path to ground on the line side of the service disconnect.
7. Specify sizing for the Main Bonding Jumper per NEC 250-102 (c). (8) 500KCMIL = 4000(0.125) = 500 KCMIL.
8. The 15 KVA Transformer, with 18.1 FLA on the primary, takes (18.1)(2.5)=45.1. Table 450-3(b) does not allow rounding up, so the CB on the primary should be 45A, not 50.
9. 50A CB does not protect #12 15 KVA X'FMR feeder at its ampacity.
10. #12 GND on load side of 50A CB for 15 KVA X'FMR is undersized per Table 250-122.
11. Feeder on the secondary to 15 KVA X'FMR, #10 GND is undersized. Smallest size per Table 250-66 is #8.
12. Feeder on the secondary to 300 KVA X'FMR, 2/0 GND is undersized. Should be 3/0 per Table 250-66.
13. Feeder on the secondary to 225 KVA X'FMR, 1/0 GND is undersized. Should be 2/0 per Table 250-66.

Sheet E-4
1. LA2-42 has receptacles on Floor Power Plan. On the Panel Schedule this is a spare.
2. For the freight elevator, Grid C-7, provide a separate branch circuit for the Machinery Space Lighting and Receptacle, per NEC 620-23. Fulfill all requirements of this Code Section.
3. For the freight elevator, Grid C-7, provide a separate branch circuit for the Hoistway Pit Lighting and Receptacle, per NEC 620-24. Fulfill all requirements of this Code Section.
4. Disconnect for elevator is not clearly shown in Room 122. Symbols are overlaid one on top of the other in a congested fashion. Please clarify per NEC 620-51 (c).
5. Clearly define which receptacles and which lights go on which circuits for elevator car (620-22), elevator equipment room (620-23) , and elevator pit (620-24). Show location of OC device per 620-22, pit lighting switch per 620-24 (c) , and machine room lighting switch per 620-23 (b).

Sheet E5
1. EGC for the Compressor feeders HB-37,39,41 and HB-38,40,42 should be #8 per Table 250-122, not #10.
2. Vehicle Lift of LB4-13,15 would appear to need a disconnect switch and overload protection per Article 430. Please verify this, and correct as necessary. Typical for all such circuits. And the use of #12 conductor is questionable on certain of these circuits, especially since they are all protected at 30A , and some of them have #10 conductor. Also note that #10 is the minimum size EGC on the load side of the 30A CB. Also note that there is a separate Circuit LB4-13 feeding a j-box, single pole. Please re-check all such items on this Sheet.
3. Regarding EC4 on this Sheet, there is no such piece of equipment on the Mechanical Schedules. Provide overload protection for this piece of equipment per Article 430. If this is indeed a 5 HP unit at 480V 3-phase, it would draw 7.6A per Table 430-150, thus could not be properly Ground Fault and Short Circuit protected by the 70A CB on HB-32,34,36.
4. There are Circuits LB3-13,15 feeding a single receptacle, but according to the Panel Schedule this is to be a Vehicle Lift. Please clarify. Please re-check all such items on this Sheet.
5. Regarding EC2 on this Sheet, there is no such piece of equipment on the Mechanical Schedules. Provide overload protection for this piece of equipment per Article 430. It's Circuit, LB3-31,33,35, is Vehicle Lift and 2 spares, not serving any EC2. Also note that this Panel is a 208V Panel serving a 480V load.
6. Regarding EC3 on this Sheet, there is no such piece of equipment on the Mechanical Schedules. Provide overload protection for this piece of equipment per Article 430.

Sheet E6
1. Show International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) calculations. All buildings constructed after 1994 shall conform to its Lighting Power Budget.
2. There are two circuits HA-23. Please re-evaluate, and double-check all circuitry on this project in this regard.
3. Circuit HA-21 appears underloaded. I compute 1560 as opposed to 975 VA. Please double-check all lighting branch circuits on this sheet, for this is not a 100% inspect.

Sheet E8
1. Regarding Note 2 of the Power Plan, it still needs to be clarified which disconnects are to be fused. No such indication on plans or key to symbols.
2. IU-8 is 460/3/2.6A on Mechanical Schedule. Is 208/1/5.4A this Sheet. Please coordinate/clarify.
3. Equipment 14-19B, 14-19A, and 14-16A have no such designations on Mechanical Schedules Sheet M0.1. Coordinate and clarify. Will complete review of equipment on this Sheet after such clarifications are made, and after any issues raised in Comments 1-3 above are addressed in particular, and in general for all equipment.

Sheet E9
1. Regarding Note 2 of the Power Plan, it still needs to be clarified which disconnects are to be fused. No such indication on plans or key to symbols.
2. IU-20 on Building #2 Power Plan. No such equipment on Mechanical Schedule. Coordinate and clarify.
3. Provide overload protection for Air Compressor on Building #2 Power Plan, and all such equipment on this sheet. This may clear up after the clarification required in Comment #1 above is made. Same for the Dryer.
4. On Mezzanine Lighting and Power Plan, size the breaker to 15A to provide Ground Fault and Short Circuit Protection per NEC430 for IU-12, unless fused to provide overload protection. Typical for all such equipment. Overload and Ground Fault and Short Circuit Protection may clear up after the clarification required in Comment #1 above is made. Will complete review of Mezzanine Power on this Sheet after this has been done, along with the clarification for Comment #1 above.
4. CU-20 on Building #2 Roof Power Plan. No such equipment on Mechanical Schedule. Coordinate and clarify.

Sheet E10
1. Regarding Note 2, it still needs to be clarified which disconnects are to be fused. No such indication on plans or key to symbols.
2. AC-3 on this Sheet 17.2 MCA. Mechanical Schedule Sheet M0.1 is 0.44 HP. Please coordinate and clarify.
3. CU-14 on Circuit HG 25,27,29, is on HG-13,15,17.

Sheet E11
1. Provide overload protection for the 2 HP EF.

Sheet E-16
1. Provide calculations for both poles and foundations for any pole exceeding 20' in height.
2. Please note that all lighting fixtures shall have full cut-off lighting distribution, for any light source over 50 W. Revise as necessary. See the Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code, http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/Building_Codes/Outdoor_Lighting_Code.pdf.
3. Submit catalogue cut sheets for lighting fixtures.
4. Eliminate references to the California Electrical Code. See Specifications 1.2 A.
5. Eliminate references to the Department of Water and Power. See Specifications 2.1. In this regard, the Contractor will be dealing with Tucson Electric Power Company.
11/25/2003 MARTIN HAEBERLE BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Type VB construction may not be used per section 406.3.3 IBC. Revise allowable area calculations and building type.
2. A horizontal occupancy separation is required between a S-2 and S-1. References section 706 IBC. Incorporate fire barrier details, including supporting members, and location into the plans.
3. It appears the S occupancy classifications are reversed. Please clarify. Reference section 311.
4. Indicate on plans location of draft-stops and include detail.
5. Provide amounts to be stored in oil storage room, room 173, justifying proposed occupancy classification.
6. Type V construction is not allowed story increases. Non-separated uses is not allowed if story requirement is not met. References section 504.2 IBC. Please clarify.
7. Door schedule notes reference state code for accessibility. City of Tucson utilizes Chapter 11 IBC and ANSI 117.1. Revise plans to meet these codes and standards.
8. Storage room 003,car wash, is required to have a 1 hour fire separation per Table 302.1.1 IBC. Revise door schedule to meet protected opening requirements.
9. Grading plan to reflect condition 2 of the soils report for building pad locations in order to meet building design criteria.
10. Provide occupant load calculation per Table 1003.2.2.2. Note: utilize gross area.
11. Provide fixture calculations per Chapter 29 of the IBC.
11/26/2003 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
11/28/2003 WMARUM1 ZONING REVIEW Denied Zoning will approve the building plans upon approval by the commercial reviewers. This is to ensure that the building footprint, placement, or height does change as a result of issues still pending which must be addressed to the satisfaction of the commercial reviewers.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/22/2003 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed