Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T03CM04982
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/17/2003 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Robert W. Bollin 29802 Avenida De Las Banderas Rancho Santa Margarita, California, 92688 SUBJECT: 6216 E. 22nd Street Site plan T03CM04982 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 24 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Report. The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies with resubmittal. 2. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 3. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 4. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 5. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 6. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 7. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 8. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 9. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 10. Intersection widening is required for Wilmot Road per Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 11. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the SP. See attached sheet. 12. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 13. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 14. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 15. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. 16. Please provide adjacent property grades for review in accordance with in 2000 IBC section 13 concerning fills. 17. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 18. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 19. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 20. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". Drainage Report: 1. The DR review was done for site plan purposes only, the final acceptance is granted along with the grading plan. 2. Please provide details of the landscaped areas and drainage features (pipes) to be used for retention/detention basins along 22nd Street for review. 3. Please note that no retention/detention basins are allowed in the public right-of-way. 4. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR and maintenance check list, see attached. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 11/21/2003 | ANY | SANITATION | REVIEW | Denied | To: Robert W. Bollin 29802 Avenida De Las Banderas Rancho Santa Margarita, California, 92688 SUBJECT: 6216 E. 22nd Street Site plan T03CM04982 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 24 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies with resubmittal. 2. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 11/26/2003 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/26/2003 | DAVID RIVERA | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See Zoning comments |
| 11/26/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Per LUC 3.7.2.4.1 "Street landscape borders shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet wide as measured from the street property line. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way line as determined by Sec. 2.8.3.4." Revise the landscape plan to include dimensions for the width of the street landscape borders. Revise as necessary to provide ten feet. 2) Per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.2 "Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets". Revise the plans to include street landscape borders which are located entirely on site or obtain approval in writing from the City Engineer to locate up to five of the required ten feet in the public right of way. Include any approvals obtained with future submittals. 3) Additional canopy trees should be provided within the street landscape borders in the northeast portion of the site. One canopy tree is required for every thirty-three feet per LUC 3.7.2.4. Although trees may be planted at varying distances, the distance between any two canopy trees should not exceed 66 feet. Palm trees are not counted toward meeting the canopy tree requirement. LUC 6.2.3 4) After making requested revisions, evaluate the plans for compliance with LUC 3.7.3.4 which requires that "Any screen higher than thirty (30) inches must be located outside of the sight visibility triangle." Plants which typically exceed thirty inches in height should be relocated or substituted. 5) Revise the plans to provide continuous screening near the intersection of Wilmot Road and Twenty-Second Street. Vegetative screening is required be a minimum of thirty inches high and is required year round. The height of screening material adjacent to property lines is measured on the project side of the screen, at finish grade. DS 2-06.3.7 6) Show any required screen walls on the site and landscape plans. A five-foot high masonry wall is required on the south and west property lines. DS 2-07.2.2, LUC Table 3.7.2-I |
| 11/26/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception per 2002 P.C. color aerial photo. |
| 11/26/2003 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSC TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T03CM04982 6216 E. 22nd St. Jim Click Ford Auto Dealership Site Plan Transmittal date: 1st Review, November 25, 2003 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. Return all redlines or previous copies of the plans as reference with the new site plan submittal packet. 1. A Pima County Assessor's Tax Code Combo and a Lot Combo Covenant will be required prior to final approval of the site plan. The Pima County Assessor's Tax Code Combo will combine all existing parcel tax codes into one parcel tax code number. This process is to be completed through the Pima County Assessor's Office. The Lot Combo Covenant is a City of Tucson form that must be filled out and recorded with the Pima Count Recorder's Office. Copies of both forms and a copy of the recordation receipt for the lot combo covenant recordation must be submitted with the subsequent site plan packet. This issue was previously discussed in two pre-submittal conferences with the consultants. I have attached a copy of the Lot Combo Covenant to the yellow review record card. DS 2-02.2.1.A.2 2. Add the distance and bearings for the north property line or curve data table. DS 2-02.2.1.A.5 List or indicate on the plan the proposed building heights for building's two and three. DS 2-02.2.1.A.6 3. Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.C, a four-foot wide concrete sidewalk will be required at the location along the north west side of building one where five of the required vehicle parking spaces have been provided. The sidewalk must be provided between the spaces and the building. Unfortunately the sidewalk would require that the parking spaces be pushed out onto the PAAL thus reducing the width to less than the required 24 feet. If a decision is made to relocate the five parking spaces elsewhere on the site or roof top, a five-foot pedestrian refuge area must be provided in the same location which is affected by the five proposed parking spaces. DS 2-02.2.1.A.8 4. Add a detail drawing of the area to be utilized for the bicycle parking within building three. The detail drawing should be added to sheet A-4. The detail must demonstrate how the requirements for the bicycle parking facilities per D.S. 2-09 have been met. DS 2-02.2.1.A.9 5. Existing and future sight visibility triangles at all driveway entrances must be drawn on the plan, sheet A-3. Additional comments will be forthcoming based on sight triangle placement and obstructions or parking spaces that are within the sight triangle area that will affect the visibility through the triangle. See comment by the Engineering Section Reviewer. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 6. As mentioned in comment three, along the northwest side of building one a four-foot sidewalk is required between the five parking spaces and the building. A five wide pedestrian refuge area is required between the PAAL and building three. See redlines. With the required refuge areas around building three and sidewalk between the five parking spaces and building one, the PAAL within this area will not meet the minimum width requirements for two-way traffic. Please redesign as required to accommodate the PAAL the parking spaces and the required sidewalk and refuge areas. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 7. The proposed sign locations may be within the sight visibility triangles and may cause visibility problems. As mentioned in comment five obstructions such as parking spaces signs walls etc that are within sight triangles must be relocated outside the line of sight. The sign may not be taller than thirty inches in height if it is to be placed within the sight triangle. Please specify the proposed sign type and size. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 8. This project is to be provided with four, 12 feet wide by 35 feet long loading spaces. Please list under the project tabulation text block on sheet A-3, the size and the number of loading zones required/provided. Add a keynote indicating the location of the loading zones. DS 2-02.2.1.A. 9. See comments by the Landscape Reviewer regarding the requirements for landscape borders, screening and NPPO. DS 2-02.2.1.A.27 10. Label the zoning classifications adjacent to the west and south property lines. See redlines. DS 2-02.2.1.A. 11. Under the Project Tabulation text block sheet A-3, list the development designator (DD "31") and the subject to section numbers LUC section 3.5.9.5.A.and .B. Also please list "Retail Trade Use 6.3.10". Indicate by general note how the LUC subject to sections will be met. DS 2-02.2.1.A.31. 12. The dumpster location could not be verified on the site plan. Please add a keynote for the dumpster. DS 2-02.2.1.A.32 13. Please address the additional concerns by notes, response comments, or additional detail drawings on the site plan as required. Please clarify what the area in the northeast corner of the site is to be used for. A wheel chair ramp is indicated on the plan and is identified as a wheel chair ramp per detail 8-A4. The wheel chair ramp does not lead to a sidewalk or pedestrian circulation path out to the street. Clarify by note and detail drawing. It is not clear on the drawings or even by the detail mechanical equipment storage area if the structure is strictly a 12-foot high wall enclosure or if a roof structure is proposed. (I am assuming that because it is a mechanical storage that a roof will not be constructed.) For clarification please indicate on the plan if the structure is a complete enclosure with or without a roof. If the enclosure is roofed the structure becomes part of the building area and must be addressed as such for parking calculations, loading zones and floor area ratios. The square footage of the structure is not that great and would not increase any of the above mentioned items significantly but must be addressed. Label the required parking spaces on the roof. The rooftop parking spaces must be dimensioned. The PAAL widths must be labeled, and the number of parking spaces must be listed. Indicate the pedestrian access from the roof parking area to the first floor. (I am also assuming that these roof top spaces will be used by the employees rather than by customers.) Add a note stating if this is so. Also please label the vehicle access ramp, the width of the ramp, and the direction of travel. Sheet A-4 was missing from the site plan sheets packet. Please insure that sheet A-4 is included in the next site plan submittal packet. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and landscape plan and requested documents. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/04/2003 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/04/2003 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |