Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T03CM04935
Parcel: 13629003A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T03CM04935
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/15/2003 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied Needs WW / IWC review of exterior wash bay and sand interceptor
10/22/2003 Robert Sherry MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Provide energy code compliance calculations. Reference Section 101.2, International Energy Conservation Code 1998.
10/22/2003 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Resize the water piping using the results of the calculations shown on sheet P1.1. Reference Section A5.1, UPC 1994.
2. Include the water demand for the evaporative cooler when sizing the water piping. Reference Section A2.2, UPC 1994.
3. Relocate drywells to comply with Section 313.3, UPC 1994.
4. If the specified water heater is not supplied with integral heat traps, provide heat traps on the supply and discharge piping along with ½" insulation on the first eight feet of supply and discharge piping. Reference Section 704.4, IECC 1998.
5. Indicate the installed height of the water heater will be less than 8'- 0" or show that the suspended water heater will comply with the access requirements of Section 511.0, UPC 1994 with AZ State amendments.
6. Coordinate location and types of cleanouts in private sewer shown on sheets C3.1 and P1.1. Reference Section 719.1, UPC 1994.
7. Revise detail of 2-way cleanout shown on sheet C3.1 to match the 2-way cleanout shown on sheet P2.1. Reference Section 707.7, UPC 1994.
8. Provide a detail to clarify keynotes 8 and C, sheet C3.1. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
9. Provide location and sizing information for gutters and downspouts. Reference Appendix D, UPC 1994.
10/22/2003 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
10/28/2003 Loren Makus ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: October 31, 2003
TO: Sam Camacho and Joe O'Neil, City of Tucson
SUBJECT: Fred Enke Golf Maintenance Facility, Site Plan and Grading Plan Review
REVIEWER: Loren Makus
ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T03CM04935 and T03BU02663

SUMMARY: The Site Plan and Grading Plan were reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering Division. The Site Plan, Grading Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) were not approved at this time.
Site and Grading Plan comments:
1. Revise the calculations for the required retention volume. The runoff coefficients for the five-year rainfall depth must be used. (See Table 4.3, Page 4.7 in the Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management). Revise the Site Plan and Grading Plan to be consistent with the revised retention requirements.
2. Prepare a SWPPP that meets the minimum requirements of the AzPDES General Permit. Use the checklist available on the ADEQ web site to ensure that all required elements are included. Include a copy of the completed checklist with the resubmittal. The checklist is available at www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html#const.

Revise the Site Plan, Grading Plan and the SWPPP to address all of these comments and resubmit two copies of the grading plan and three copies of the SWPPP. If you would like to meet with me to discuss any of these comments please call me at (520) 791-5550 ext. 1161.

Loren Makus
Senior Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services
11/06/2003 Linda Buczynski ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1. WH-1 is listed on Sheet P2-2 as single phase 6KW, max., and on Electrical Plans and Panel Schedule as 3-phase, 9KW. Please clarify.
2. On Single Line Diagram, the 1/0 feeder, with an ampacity of 150A, is not protected by the 200 AF.
3. On the same feeder as referred to in Comment #2 above, please note that the City does not accept the use of "Let Through" Current as a method to attenuate fault current for other than motor circuits. However, a quick calculation reveals that if the 27,800 amps is available at the secondary terminals of the TEP transformer, the system elements depicted in the line diagram are not under-rated. Please provide fault current available at Panel P.
4. Provide for a seal where the conduit exits the dispenser. See NEC 514-7 (a).
5. Call for listed equipment to serve as the means to remove all external voltage sources, including feedback, during maintenance and service of dispensing equipment, or provide an Engineer's certified design for such a scheme, including all power, control, relays, contacts, etc.
6. Provide a seal at the panelboard. See commentary to NEC 514-7 in the Handbook.
11/17/2003 Martin Haeberle BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Approval to defer the submittal of the metal building requires the approval of the Building Official. Please submit a request to Dave Mann PE, Building Official including the approximate date of its submittal.
2. Mixed use of building requires a 3-hour separation wall. References section 406.6.2 IBC. Provide details and listing for the required fire barrier and its openings.
3. Provide occupant load calculations per Table 1003.2.2.2 IBC
4. Provide plumbing fixture calculations per Table 2902.1, including number of male and female restrooms per section 2902.2 IBC.
5. Structural calculations to be sealed by Grenier Engineering.
6. Footing/ anchoring schedule says see detail. Detail says see schedule. Please clarify.
7. Plans to include listed method for pipe penetrations of fire barrier.
8. Unit heater #1 to be a minimum of 8 feet above the floor or be enclosed by a 2-hour fire barrier. Reference section 406.6.5 IBC. Please clarify
11/18/2003 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied Zoning may not approve the structural plans until the site plan has been approved and the structural plans have been approved by Structural Review.
11/19/2003 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Denied 1. Fire hydrant required. submit approved COT Water Plan.
2. Minimum 20 ft. wide, paved fire apparatus access roadway must be provided and extended to within 150 feet of all portions of exterior walls of facility. A turnaround is required for dead-end raodways. Lenght of dead-end drive shall not exceed 1200 feet. ( Measure from centerline of connecting paved street to back of proposed turnaround.)

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/21/2003 MONICA VALDEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/19/2003 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed