Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T03CM04907
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/09/2004 | Patricia Gilbert | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: February 10, 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM04907 PROJECT NAME: Addition: Apartment Buildings PROJECT ADDRESS: 5126 East Bellevue Street PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN 1. Currently the sight distances are correct on the sight visibility triangles however the distances are on the wrong side. Please switch the distances. Revise plan as necessary. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10. 2. Pedestrian access is now clearly delineated within the ROW and on site. However it is not clearly indicated that the pedestrian access is sidewalk. Demonstrate that the pedestrian access is sidewalk. 3. On the site plan "pedestrian excess" is called out on the plan in several areas. Pedestrian excess? Is there a pedestrian excess or is it actually supposed to be called out as pedestrian access? Revise plan as necessary. |
| 02/24/2004 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/01/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception. |
| 03/01/2004 | Andrew Connor | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the plans to provide a 5' high screen along Bellevue behind or at the back of the street landscape border. LUC Table 3.7.2-I This screen is required to screen the parking area. The required screen may not be located in the sight visibility triangles. 2) A 5' high masonry screen wall is required along portions of the east property line to screen the vehicular use area from the adjacent residentially zoned property. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 3) Include the genus and species of all proposed plantings. DS 2-07.2.2 |
| 03/05/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See zoning comments. |
| 03/05/2004 | Peter McLaughlin | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Metro Permit Express 1001 N. Alvernon Way #105 Tucson, AZ 85711 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T03CM04907 Addition to Bellevue Apartments 5126 E. Bellevue Street 2nd review TRANSMITTAL: March 5, 2004 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Along with the LDO case number, add the date of approval (December 26, 2003) and conditions imposed. Once it is ready to be approved by the zoning review section, the LDO approval stamps must be transferred to the final site plan set. DS 2-02.2.1.A.32 2. Revise the reference to "LOD" along the east property line to refer to LDO 03-203. DS 2-02.2.1.A.32 3. To adjacent commercial zoned property (to the south) the required setback is the height of the building. From the street front property line the required building setback is the greater of 20 feet or 1-1/2 times the building height. Please revise the setback table to correctly state these required setbacks. LUC 3.2.6.4 LUC 3.2.6.5 DS 2-02.2.1.A.7 4. The elevation drawing (fig A/C-2) indicates that the height to the midpoint of the roof is 19.11 feet from design grade elevation. For setback purposes, heights are not taken from the midpoint but rather from the highest point along the exterior building wall. Please revise the heights and required setbacks on line 15 of the Project Data table accordingly. LUC 3.2.6.3 DS 2-02.2.1.A.6 & .7 5. Because proposed bicycle parking is located toward the rear of the site, away from Bellevue Street, directional signage must be provided indicating the location of class 2 bicycle parking. Show the location of the directional signage on the site plan. DS 2-09.5.1 6. The vehicle use area given on project data lines 29 and on line 48 in the lot coverage calculation is not correct. Revise vehicle use area square footage to include all areas used for parking and access drives. Revise lot coverage total and percentage in the calculation to reflect the correct square footage. LUC 3.2.9 LUC 3.2.3.1.D DS 2-02.2.2.A.3 7. Correct the parking calc to show that for multi-family dwellings, exactly one-and a half (1.5) spaces are required for each one bedroom unit. DS 2-02.2.2.A.4 LUC 3.3.4 8. For uses providing between 26 and 50 parking spaces, two (2) handicap parking spaces must be provided. Please revise site plan and h/c parking calcs. Also, while h/c ramps may not exceed slope of 1:12, the slope of pavement within the h/c parking space and its adjacent aisle may not exceed 1:48. Please revise h/c parking detail. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/26/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/25/2004 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |