Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T03CM04523
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/20/2003 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/23/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the NPPO notes on sht. N1 to refer to city regulations rather than similar Pima County requirements. LUC 3.8 Identify on the native plant preservation plan the location of temporary fencing required to preserve the vegetation outside of the project limits. DS 2-15.5.0 Identify any protected vegetation not included in the plant inventory south of the bike jump facility which may be located within the project limits in the vicinity of the asphalt path and utility installations, if necessary. Show the location of transplanted vegetation on the landscape plan and include a summary of NPPO requirements (# of PIP & TOS for each species). Revise the calculations on sheet N1 for consistency with information in the plant inventory list or vice-versa. Refer to the rows labeled prosopis velutina, tree sub-total, and saguaro sub-total. |
| 10/23/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The project includes development across and in the vicinity of a wash proposed for protection. Submit a hydrology/hydraulic study, a plant/habitat inventory, and a mitigation plan per TCC Sec. 29-15 & 16. Revise the landscape plans as necessary to comply with wash mitigation requirements and any applicable NPPO comments. |
| 10/24/2003 | DAN CASTRO | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/24/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Note the legal description of the property. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2) 2. Since the bike facility is located within an existing park, please provide a small index drawing of the park's property lines. In addition, provide lot dimensions and bearings. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5) 3. If applicable, all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use must be noted on the plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8) 4. If applicable, dimension building/structure setbacks to property lines. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7) 5. If applicable, all existing or proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20) 6. Label the existing zoning of parcel and adjacent parcels. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28) 7. Provide the gross and net lot area. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A1) 8. This plan may be reviewed over the counter by the Zoning Review Section. Please contact Dan Castro to set an appointment. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 10/27/2003 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/29/2003 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/28/2003 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |