Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T03CM04370
Parcel: 116161610

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM

Permit Number - T03CM04370
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/17/2004 David Witt BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL REVIEW Denied PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - PROJECT #T03CM04370

PLAN REVIEW FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED STRUCTURE HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THIS LETTER REFLECTS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A SHORTER BACK CHECK TIME, WE REQUEST THAT YOU PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS, HIGHLIGHTING ANY CHANGES, ALONG WITH A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE NOTED ITEMS INDICATING ACTION TAKEN.

SCOPE OF REVIEW:

THE SCOPE OF THIS PLAN REVIEW COVERS ARCHITECTURAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, MODEL ENERGY AND ELECTRICAL CODES. ALL CODE REFERENCES ARE TO THE 2000 IRC AND STATE PLUMBING CODE. ALL FEATURES WERE CHECKED ONLY TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE SUBMITTALS PROVIDED. ALL PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT ARE ASSUMED TO MEET OR WILL MEET OTHER DEPARTMENTAL REQUIREMENTS, CONDITIONS AND CONCERNS BEFORE PERMIT APPROVAL.

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:

1. ALL PLANS SHALL BE LEGIBLE AND A SCALE NO SMALLER THAN ¼ INCH = 1-FOOT SHALL BE USED
FOR ALL FLOOR PLANS, FRAMING PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. DETAILS &CROSS SECTIONS AT A MINIMUM 3/8 INCH = 1-FOOT SCALE.
2. ALL CORRECTIONS AND REVISIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AND TWO NEW SETS OF PRINTS OR (1) SEPIA & (1) BLUE LINE SHALL BE RETURNED ALONG WITH ALL REDLINE PRINTS.

3. PEN OR PENCIL CORRECTIONS ON FINAL PRINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. TO AVOID DELAYS ENSURE ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, ARE COMPLETE AND HAVE BEEN COORDINATED ON ALL APPLICABLE DETAILS AND NOTES.

FLOOR PLAN:

1. SPECIFY WHICH FIRE SYSTEM IS TO BE USED FOR THE ELECTRICAL PENETRATION OF THE 1-HR. DEMISING WALL BEHIND THE RANGE AND THE RECEPTACLE BOXES. PLEASE NOTE , ALSO, ON THE ELECTRICAL PLAN.

2. WILL THE 3440 XO WINDOW IN THE KITCHEN INTERFERE WITH THE COUNTERTOP? NOT A CODE ISSUE.

3. THE WATER HEATER IS REQUIRED TO BE ABLE TO BE SERVICED WITHOUT REMOVING THE DRYER.

4. LOCATE AND IDENTIFY SHEAR WALL TYPES AND LOCATIONS. PROVIDE NAILING SCHEDULE.

FOUNDATION PLANS:

1. NOTE ON THE DRAWINGS THE ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE USED IN THE DESIGN OF THE FOOTINGS,
OR STATE THAT THE ASSUMED VALUE OF 1500 PSF IS BEING USED, PER TABLE R401.4.1, A SOILS REPORT IS
NOT REQUIRED. IT IS UP TO THE DESIGNER/HOMEBUILDER TO BE AWARE OF THE SOIL AND CONDITIONS OF
THE SITE. IF SOIL TESTING HAS BEEN DONE, A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE
CONSTRUCTION PLANS, AND THE FOUNDATION DESIGN SHALL REFLECT THE SOILS REPORTS
RECOMMENDATIONS.

2. PROVIDE A LANDING AT THE FRONT DOOR. THE SIDEWALK WILL SUFICE FOR THIS SITE PLAN, BUT IS REQUIRED ON YOUR MODEL PLAN WHICH WILL BE USED WHEN A SIDEWALK MIGHT NOT BE THERE.

STRUCTURAL PLANS:

1. SPECIFY DESIGN CRITERIA ON PLANS. VALUES FOR FLOOR DEAD LOAD AND LIVE LOAD, ROOF DEAD LOAD
AND LIVE LOAD.

2. PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S DATA SHEET FOR THE PRE-FAB TRUSSES. TRUSS CALCULATIONS MUST BE SIGNED, DATED AND WET-SEALED BY AN ENGINEER WHO IS REGISTERED IN ARIZONA. PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT THE 600# ROOF MOUNTED A/C IS ACCOMMODATED.





ELEVATIONS:

1. FOAM INSULATION: CLARIFY YOUR COMPLIANCE WITH R318 ON THE WALLS TO THE ATTIC PER R318.2.3.

SECTIONS - DETAILS - MISC. NOTES:

1. FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTE 1 / A-1 ; PLEASE INCLUDE THE 3/8" O.S.B. WALL SHEATHING IN THE DESCRIPTION OF THE WALL'S COMPOSITION.

2. FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTE 13 / A-1 ; PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION ON THE PLAN VIEW.

3. PROVIDE A DETAIL OF A TYPICAL INTERIOR WALL ILLUSTRATING THE CONNECTIONS AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM.

4. ROOF VENTILATION CALCULATIONS / A-1 ; PROVIDE A LISTING FOR THE 4" RIDGE VENT JUSTIFYING 4" OF FREE AIR PER L.F.

5. 2 / S-1 ; DESCRIBE THE LENGTH OF THE ANCHOR BOLT.

6. 1, 3, 4 / S-1 ; DESCRIBE THE ROOF SHEATHING.

7. 1 / S-1 ; IS THE BOND BEAM MISPLACED?

8. 1 / S-1 ; DESCRIBE THE CEILING S/R. SEE TABLE R702.3.5 FOOTNOTE D.

9. 3 / S-1 ; DESCRIBE THE RIDGE BLOCKING

10. 3 / S-1 ; DESCRIBE THE BRACE'S CONNECTIONS.

11. 3 / S-1 ; DESCRIBE THE G.W.B. ON THE DEMISING WALL.

12. 4 / S-1 ; WHERE IS PLAN NOTE 9? THIS BRACING ISN'T OPTIONAL, IT'S REQUIRED AT BOTH ENDS.

13. 4 / S-1 ; DESCRIBE THE CEILING'S G.W.B. SEE TABLE R702.3.5 FOOTNOTE D.

14. 7 / S-1 ; PAHD42's AREN'T RATED AT 1800# UNLESS THEY ARE 8" FROM AN OUTSIDE CORNER BUT THE HOLD-DOWNS ARE REQUIRED ON END STUDS. SHOULD THEY BE HPAHD22's WHICH ARE OKAY ½" FROM AN OUTSIDE CORNER?

15. 7 / S-1 ; PROVIDE THE NAIL PATTERN FOR THE SHEATHING. SEE R602.10.6 .

16. 7 / S-1 ; PROLIDE THE LOCATION OF THE ANCHOR BOLTS. SEE R602.10.6 .

17. 7 / S-1 ; PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SHEATHING IS TO BE VERTICAL AND BLOCKED. SEE R602.10.6 .

18. GENERAL NOTE 2d / S-1 ; NOTE THE SIESMIC DESIGN CATEGORY IS "C".

19. ROUGH CARPENTRY NOTE b /S-1 ; PLEASE SPEC THE FACE GRAIN TO BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE FRAMING INSTEAD OF THE EDGE GRAIN.

PLUMBING PLANS:

1. PLEASE SIZE THE REST OF THE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM.

2. THE D.W.V. SYSTEM ISN'T PERMITTED AS DRAWN. AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING MIGHTCLARIFY THE VENT / TRAP SITUATIONS.

3. CORRECT THE MATH IN THE "PLUMBING FIXTURE SCHEDULE FOR EACH UNIT" TABLE.





ELECTRICAL PLANS:

1. RECEPTACLES ARE REQUIRED ON THE WALLS BETWEEN THE BEDROOM DOORS AND THE CLOSET DOORS. SEE E3801.2.2 .

2. PLEASE INDICATE THE RANGE CIRCUIT AS "C 1,4" ON THE PLAN VIEW.

3. ILLUSTRATE A FUSED DISCONNECT AND CIRCUIT FOR THE ROOF MOUNTED A/C.

4. PROVIDE AN EXTERIOR OUTLET AT GRADE LEVEL LOCATED AT BOTH THE FRONT AND BACK OF THE
DWELLING, PER E3801.7. THESE OUTLETS SHALL BE GFI PROTECTED PER E3802.3.

5. WHERE CEILING FANS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS, PROVIDE A NOTE INDICATING ONLY APPROVED
OUTLET BOXES SHALL BE USED, PER E4001.6. ARE THE CEILING J-BOXES FOR FANS?

6. PROVIDE A SMOKE DETECTOR IN THE AREA IMMEDIATELY OUTSIDE THE BEDROOMS.


MODEL ENERGY CODE:

JUSTIFY THE R-VALUES FOR THE CEILING AND WALLS. SEE N1102.1.2 , N1102.1.1 , OR TABLE N1102.1

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ASSIGNED PLANS EXAMINER:
DAVE WITT @ 791-5550 EXT. 1110
03/22/2004 Andrew Connor NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit NPPO or Application for Exception per DS 2-15.2.0
03/22/2004 Loren Makus ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: March 22, 2004
TO: Mr. Victor Gill
SUBJECT: Plot Plan/Site Plan and Floodplain Use Permit for Elpidio Medrano Residence
REVIEWER: Loren Makus
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM04370 and T04OT00386

SUMMARY: The Plot Plan/Site Plan and Floodplain Use Permit Application were reviewed by Development Services Department, Engineering Division on March 22, 2004. The site plan was not approved. Please address the following comments.

Site Plan Comments:
1) The February 18, 2003 Hydrology Report from Patterson Hydrology Drainage Engineering, Inc indicates that the lowest floor elevation for the proposed duplex must be at least 2236.0 feet NAVD88. The existing grade for the parcel averages about 2333.0 feet NADV88. Revise the plan to show how the required lowest floor elevation will be met.
2) Provide estimated cut and fill quantities for the proposed project.
3) If more than 50 cubic yards of fill are to be placed on the lot, a grading permit will be required. The grading permit application must be accompanied by a grading plan showing the extent of the grading to be done, existing and finish grades, locations of utilities
4) If fill is used to provide the elevation of the structure, it must comply with the floodplain ordinance. Tucson Code Section 26-8.d.2 states, "In areas where fill is to be used to raise the elevation of the building site, the building line shall be located not less than twenty-five (25) feet landward from any edge of the fill, unless a study prepared by a state-registered professional civil engineer and approved by the city engineer shows that a lesser distance is acceptable. No fill shall be placed in any floodway; nor shall any fill be placed where it diverts, retards or obstructs the flow of water to such an extent that it creates a danger or hazard to life or property in the area."


Revise the Plot Plan/Site Plan to address all of these comments and resubmit two copies for review. Include a letter explaining how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions or if you wish to set up a meeting please call me at 791-5550 ext. 1161.

Loren Makus, E.I.T.
Senior Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services
03/23/2004 MELISSA POULIN WWM REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/21/2004 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
03/23/2004 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed