Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL
Permit Number - T03CM04147
Review Name: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/18/2003 | EROSE1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 09/18/2003 | STANTEC | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this review covers Architectural, Structural, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittal provided. All portions of the project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. GENERAL: q Sheet T1 indicates in the general notes that this project is to be built to the 2000 International Plumbing Code. This reference should be to the 1994 Uniform Plumbing Code as amended by the State of Arizona. ARCHITECTURAL: q Detail 3 on Sheet P-2 indicates that the mounting height of the water heater is not to be over 8'-0". However, the height of the ceiling underneath this water heater is 8'-0". A permanent ladder access is required for any water heater mounted on a platform at 8'-0" or higher above the finish floor [1994 UPC Sec. 511.2]. Either provide a ladder to access this water heater or find a location that is lower than 8'-0". q The fixture/accessory mounting elevation provided on Sheet A2 also needs to include a urinal. STRUCTURAL: q Provide a note on the plans that the manufacturer's calculations and data for the pre-engineered metal building shall be submitted as a deferred submittal for review and approval by the building department prior to fabrication. Drawings and calculations must be signed, dated and wet-sealed by an engineer who is registered in Arizona. Also, the Architect of Record shall review and "shop drawing" stamp approval the shop drawings and calculations. q There are 6 new packaged heat pumps weighing between 700 and 790 lbs. each and 2 new evaporative coolers that weigh 650 lbs. each. Are these new units replacing existing units in the same locations? If not, what is the structural impact of the additional weight to the building? Please clarify. MECHANICAL: q There are no mechanical comments to be addressed. PLUMBING: q There are no plumbing comments to be addressed. ELECTRICAL: q There are no electrical comments to be addressed. -End of Review- |
| 09/18/2003 | EROSE1 | WATER | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 09/18/2003 | EROSE1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/18/2003 | ELAINE ROSE | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |