Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T03CM04061
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/25/2003 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Site Plan 1. Indicate lot dimensions and bearings. Text height is to be 0.12" or greater in size. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 2. Indicate roof slope and downspouts. Indicate a detailed dimension of downspouts. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 3. Indicate and label existing and future sight visibility triangles with appropriate lengths. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 4. Identify dimensioned PAAL area and parking space. 5. If applicable, indicate location, type, size and of existing and proposed signage. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 6. Indicate drainage patterns with flow arrows. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.16 7. If applicable, indicate all easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 8. Indicate dimensions from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21 9. Indicate existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.23 Drainage Report 1. Identify Watersheds on Figure 3: Onsite Drainage Plan. |
| 08/25/2003 | BLANCA ESPINO | SANITATION | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/16/2003 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire hydrant location incorrect. |
| 09/17/2003 | Joseph Linville | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/23/2003 | DAN CASTRO | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/23/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Label the height of the canopy. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6) 2. The site plan does not distinguish between parking spaces for visitors and employees and display/storage spaces. Please indicate on the site plan the parking spaces set aside for visitors and employees and spaces for display/storage. Based on the "Vehicle Rental and Sales" parking requirements (L.U.C. 3.3.4), 166 parking spaces are required for visitors and employees. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8) 3. Add the zoning classification (C-3) of parcels to the north and east of the project site. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28) 4. If applicable, provide type, size, and height of existing and proposed free-standing signage. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13) 5. Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.1, a minimum setback of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between the rear of the building and the PAAL. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12) 6. Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.D, a back sup spur is required at the end of a row of parking where no ingress or egress is provided at that end. The spur will be a minimum of three (3) feet in depth, will have a three (3) foot radii, and will have a wheel barrier to prevent encroachment onto any sidewalk or unsurfaced areas. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11) 7. Based on the proposed GFA of 35,608 S.F, please revise the loading zone calculation on sheet T1 to state the correct number of loading zones required to three (3). (LUC 3.4.5.3) (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5) 8. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. (D.S. 2-07.2.1.A) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 09/24/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved |