Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T03CM04009
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/15/2003 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/29/2003 | Loren Makus | SANITATION | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/29/2003 | Loren Makus | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: September 2, 2003 TO: William Ford SUBJECT: Childrens Medical Center of Tucson Eastside, Site Plan and Grading Plan Review REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T03CM04009 and T03BU02065 SUMMARY: The Site Plan and Grading Plan were reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering Division. The grading plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) were not approved at this time. Site and Grading Plan comments: 1. Clarify the extent of the proposed disturbed area. Provide a clear limit of grading. The Horizontal Control/Roof Plan indicates a future pad location. The Utilities and Grading Plan labels this area "Future Pad Natural Area" and includes a note to swale drainage away from building. The Landscape Plan indicates that the area is to be undisturbed but includes a note that the area should be provided with "positive dust protection … unless the area(s) are undisturbed natural desert." Revise the plans to be clearly consistent. 2. Clarify the meaning of the areas labeled "Improved Area." If these areas are to be developed as a part of this project, they must be included in the disturbed area calculations. If a total of one acre of more, including improvements in the right of way and any trenching, is to be disturbed, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan must be submitted with the grading plan. 3. Provide a drainage statement that demonstrates that historic drainage patterns will not be altered by this project. Drainage flows must be accepted and discharged in accordance with pre-development conditions. (City of Tucson Development Standard (DS) 2-02.2.2.C) 4. Provide sufficient proposed finish grades and spot elevations for all graded areas to demonstrate that the proposed drainage scheme meets the requirements of the drainage statement. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.16) 5. Revise the existing site visibility triangles so that the stem of the triangle is measured from the face of the existing curb. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 and DS 3-01.5.2.B.4) 6. Provide 25-foot radius curb returns for the driveway in accordance with the Transportation Access Management Guidelines for the City of Tucson section 5.5. 7. A Right of Way Permit is required for all work in the right of way. 8. Add a comment stating that all grading will conform to IBC 2000. Revise the Grading Plan and the SWPPP to address all of these comments and resubmit two copies of the grading plan and three copies of the SWPPP. Include a copy of the approved site plan. If you would like to meet with me to discuss any of these comments please call me at (520) 791-5550 ext. 1161. Loren Makus Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 09/15/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a native plant inventory per DS 2-15.0. and obtain approval from TDOT Eng. for modifications within the public right of way. |
| 09/15/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The proposed loading zone and refuse storage areas must be screened from adjacent properties with 6' walls per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 2) Per 3.7.2.9 Use of the Public Right-of-Way. "Nonrequired landscaping may be placed in the public right-of-way, if the following requirements are met. A. The landscaping is approved by the City Engineer or designee and complies with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. " Provide verification, in writing, of City Engineer approval. Seperate permits are required for right of way development. 3) Decomposed granite is required to extend to the area between the sidewalk and the curb if none is currently present. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.3 4) Include the project address and legal description on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.1.B 5) The plan may require revision to meet the native plant preservation requirements of LUC 3.8. |
| 09/16/2003 | Peter McLaughlin | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: William Ford 1227 N. 3rd Avenue Tucson, AZ 85705 (520) 623-0364 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner Development Services Dept. FOR: PATRICIA GEHLEN Principal Planner Development Services Dept. PROJECT: T03CM04009 8895 E. Golf Links Road Site Plan Review (1st review) TRANSMITTAL: September 17, 2003 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This project is being reviewed for full code compliance. DS 2-02 2. Revise the 100'00 ROW for Golf Links Road to read "100'00" ½ ROW". DS 2-02.2.1.A.19 3. Dimension from street monument lines the distance to existing curbs. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21 4. Provide a Floor Area Ratio stating both the allowed maximum FAR and the proposed FAR. DS 2-02.2.2.A.2 5. The medical service outpatient use is subject to LUC 3.5.4.8.B, which prohibits blood donor centers. Please correct the project data note regarding use to indicate this code section. LUC 2.4.3.2.A.6 6. State the existing use on the site plan (i.e. vacant). DS 2-02.2.1.A.31 7. Because proposed bicycle parking is located toward the rear of the building away from Golf Links Road, directional signage must be provided indicating the location of class 2 bicycle parking. Show the location of the directional signage on the site plan. DS 2-09.5.1 8. It is not clear if the parking along the north property line and in the row to the east of the future pad are to be provided later as part of a phase 2 future pad development. If so, indicate this with a label on the drawing and revise parking calculations to indicate how code is being met with only the parking to be provided with phase 1, and also to indicate how code requirements will be met with future development of phase 2. 9. The two rows of vehicle parking spaces to the north of the building are stated to contain 8 spaces each, but only 7 are shown in each row on the drawing. Revise parking count for these parking rows. DS 3-05.2.2.D 10. If any easements exist or are proposed show their location on the site plan along with their dimensioned width, their purpose and the recordation information (docket and page). DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 11. It is not clear what is meant by the project data note stating a 30' height. The maximum allowed height per development designator "30" is 40 feet. Please clarify or revise. DS 2-02-2.1.A.6 12. Provide a calculation of handicapped parking required and provided. DS 2-02.2.2.A.4 13. Provide a loading zone calculation stating that one 12' × 35' loading is both required and provided. DS 2-02.2.2.A.5 14. If any free-standing outdoor lighting or signage is proposed for this site, please detail on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 & 25 15. Add existing sight-visibility triangles to the drawing. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 16. Golf Links Road is a Gateway Route. Add a note to the plan that the proposal is designed to meet the criteria of LUC 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone, and LUC 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 09/17/2003 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See zoning review comments. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/23/2003 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/23/2003 | TAMI ACHONG | REJECT SHELF | Completed |