Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL
Permit Number - T03CM03722
Review Name: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/21/2003 | EROSE1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 08/21/2003 | STANTEC | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this review covers Architectural, Structural, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittal provided. All portions of the project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. GENERAL: q There are no general comments to be addressed. ARCHITECTURAL: q On Sheet CVR-2, the Codes Used section references the Americans with Disabilities Act for accessibility. It should also reference the ICC ANSI A117.1-1998 document. q Detail 3 on Sheet A2.2 shows a scupper with a scupper overflow opening. How large is the opening? How does it meet the required provision for over flow [1994 AzUPC Appendix D, Sec. D1.1 (d)]? STRUCTURAL: q Provide a City of Tucson special inspection certificate(s) for the following: · Engineered Fill · Field Welding · Masonry q The joist and girder layout on Sheet S2.2 is incorrect relative to the structural calculations. The structural layout shown on Page iii of the structural calculations is oriented differently from the framing plan on Sheet S2.2 (it is rotated 180º), however the member sizes are not rotated. Therefore, the joists are all reversed (smaller joists are reversed with larger joists) and the girders are all switched around. Please coordinate between the calculations and the framing plan (it looks like some correction was done to the layout drawing which might not have been picked up on the framing plan). q The girder size is missing on the framing plan on Sheet S2.2 for the girder along Grid "3" between Grids "B" and "E". Please indicate. q The calculations on Page 6 indicate that the drive through canopy joists are to be a thicker gauge than the other steel framing members (0.097 inches thick). The framing plan indicates at the drive through canopy to reference the General Structural Notes (G.S.N.) for these 6" steel joists. The General Structural Notes indicate that 6" joists are to be 0.068 inches thick. Please clarify. q On Page 26 of the calculations the W16x26 beam has a reaction at each end of 2.36 kips, however the plans indicate that the reaction is to be 2 kips. Please clarify. q The unnumbered page between Page 28 and 29 of the calculations indicates that the masonry lintel at the man door at the loading dock is to be 1'-6" deep, while the plans indicate that the lintel is 1'-4" (or 16") deep. Please clarify. q Page 37 of the structural calculation has a calculation for a 3'-0" wide opening and an 8'-0" wide opening. Where are these openings? Please clarify. What do these calculations represent? q How far does the footing along Grid "1" extend between Grid "H.1" and "J". Provide a dimension to tie down this length similar to other footings on Sheet S2.1. q Is Detail 108 on Sheet S3.1 has a notation on the footing dimensions that indicates that the wall can be 10'-0" high with a 3'-4" wide footing. However, this design is not reflected in the calculations. Please provide. Also, this wall is not shown on the site civil plans. Is this detail even applicable? MECHANICAL: q There are no mechanical comments to be addressed. PLUMBING: q The floor plan on Sheet A1.1 and Detail 1 on Sheet A6.1 show a lavatory in the women's room accessible toilet stall. Where is the plumbing for this lavatory? Please coordinate. q The floor drain in the men's room and the mezzanine are not shown on the sanitary waste diagram on Sheet P3. Please indicate. A trap primer is provided for the men's room floor drain but not for the mezzanine floor drain. q The floor drain in the women's room needs to be vented [1994 UPC Sec. 901.1]. ELECTRICAL: q Detail 2 on Sheet ESP1, and Detail 110 on Sheet S3.1 address the same concrete light pole footing. Please coordinate these details. Also, provide either a structural calculation for the pole depth indicated on Detail 4 (alternate light pole) on Sheet ESP1 or remove the detail. -End of Review- |
| 08/21/2003 | EROSE1 | WATER | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 08/21/2003 | ELAINE ROSE | ZONING | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/21/2003 | ELAINE ROSE | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |