Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - T03CM03499
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/10/2003 | Loren Makus | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: September 11, 2003 TO: Malcom Calvin, The Built Environment SUBJECT: Plush Site Plan Review REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM03449 SUMMARY: The Site Plan was reviewed by Development Services Department, Engineering Division. The site plan was not approved at this time. Please address the following comments. Site Plan Comments: 1) Provide bearings for each property boundary line and the basis of bearing. (DS 2-02.2.1A.5) 2) Clear lines of sight must be maintained within the sight visibility triangles. Vehicle parking cannot be placed within the existing or future sight visibility triangles. (DS 3-01.5.1.A.1) Revise the site plan to address all of these comments and resubmit two copies for review. Include a letter explaining how each comment has been addressed. Loren Makus Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 09/19/2003 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/02/2003 | DAN CASTRO | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/02/2003 | Daniel Castro | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next Submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Per D.S. 3-01.5.1.A.1, vehicle parking spaces and screen wall for trash enclosure may not be located within a sight visibility triangle. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10) 2. Per L.U.C. Sec. 3.4.5.3 Commercial Services Us Group, one (1) 12' x 35' loading space is required for this site. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14) 3. Per LUC Sec. 3.3.4 "Alcoholic Beverage Service" a total of 127 vehicle parking spaces are required for this site. 69 vehicle parking spaces are to be provided after future right-of-way widening. Applicant will require a variance for 58 spaces. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4) 4. Add a separate vehicle parking calculation based on future right-of-way conditions. It appears two (2) vehicle parking spaces will be removed as a result of future right-of-way widening resulting in 69 vehicle parking spaces to be provided after road widening. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19) 5. Per L.U.C. Sec. 3.3.4, the proposed land use "Alcoholic Beverage Service" requires that all required vehicle parking be located within the same block. As proposed, the westernmost parking lot is located across Herbert Avenue in another block. Refer to LUC Sec. 3.3.7.1.A for description of "same block" requirements. (LUC 3.3.7.1.A) 6. Please note the proposed land use as follows: Alcoholic Beverage Service, "33", subject to: Sec. 3.5.14.9.C. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31) 7. a) Site plan may not be approved until all approved and recorded lot combination documents required have been provided to the Zoning Review Section. Per Pima County Assessors Records, the site is comprised of three (3) separate parcels which must be combined by providing a copy of the recorded City of Tucson Lot Combination Covenant and a copy of the approved Pima County Assessors Tax Combination form. b) Since Parcel 1 and 2 are to be combined into one lot, show the aforementioned lots as one consolidated parcel. 8. Since a Board of Adjustment Variance will be applied for, please note the case number, date of approval, variances granted, and any conditions imposed on the site plan. 9. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. (D.S. 2-07.2.1.A) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 10/03/2003 | Joseph Linville | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) If Board of Adjustment variances are applied for and granted, please add the case number to the lower right corner of the sheet (DS 2-07.2.1.B.2.c), 2) Street landscape borders per LUC 3.7.2.4 are required along 6th street, Fourth Avenue, and both sides of Herbert Avenue. Revise the plans to include the required borders. 3) The border required along Sixth Avenue is required to be located based on the MS&R right of way line or as provided in LUC 2.8.3.5.F. 3) A five (5) foot screen is required along the development side of the street landscape border along both sides of Herbert Avenue and a thirty-inch high screen is required along the development side of the street landscape border along 4th Avenue and 6th Street (LUC 3.7.3.2 and Table 3.7.2-I). 4) The following calculation must be added to the landscape plan: square footage of landscape areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage (2-07.2.2.A.2.g). 5) The refuse storage enclosure must be designed to meet the screening requirements of LUC Table 3.7.2-I. The opening must be screened with a 6' high gate. The gate is to provide an opaque barrier. provide information on how the proposed gate meets the screening requirements. 6) Uses such as parking and patios may not be located within the area reserved for the street landscape borders. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 7) Parked cars or other obstructions may not be located in sight visibility triangles as described in DS 3-01.5.1. Revise the site and landscape plans to show all visibility triangles and relocated any uses or structures inconsistent with the standard. |
| 10/03/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved |