Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T03CM03499
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/18/2003 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide complete code review checklist. Indicate fire rating and opening protection provided for south exterior wall. 2. Additions will result in A-2 occupancy in excess of 5000 sq. ft.. Fire sprinklers will be required throughout. Indicate so on code review checklist. |
| 07/24/2003 | Loren Makus | SANITATION | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/24/2003 | Loren Makus | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 25, 2003 TO: Matthew Hamilton, The Built Environment SUBJECT: Plush Site Plan Review REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM03116 SUMMARY: The Site Plan was reviewed by Development Services Department, Engineering Division. The site plan was not approved at this time. Please address the following comments. Site Plan Comments: 1) Call out a description of the structure at the east end of the Parking Area south of the building. Clarify whether this is a curb or a wall. Per City of Tucson Development Standard (DS) 3-05.2.2.D, if this is a wall, the backup spur must have a three-foot shy space between the curb and wall. 2) Provide bearings for each property boundary line and the basis of bearing. (DS 2-02.2.1A.5) 3) Dimension the adjacent rights of way including Major Streets and Routes future right of way. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.19) 4) Provide drainage patterns, finish grades, floor elevation and existing contours or spot elevations. (DS 2-02.1.A.10 and DS 2-02.1.A.23) 5) Show roof drainage patterns. Provide sidewalk scuppers at each downspout location and indicate that all flows up to a 10-year event will be conveyed under sidewalks. (DS 2-02.1.A.16 and DS 2-08.5.1.E) 6) Revise the trash enclosure detail to provide steel pipes along the sides and rear of the enclosure. (DS 6-01.4.2.C.2) Revise the site plan to address all of these comments and resubmit two copies for review. Include a letter explaining how each comment has been addressed. Loren Makus Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 08/08/2003 | Joseph Linville | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) If Board of Adjustment variances are applied for and granted, please add the case number to the lower right corner of the sheet (DS 2-07.2.1.B.2.c), 5) Street landscape borders per LUC 3.7.2.4 are required along 6th street, Fourth Avenue, and both sides of Herbert Avenue. Revise the plans to include the required borders. 6) The border required along Sixth Avenue is required to be located based on the MS&R right of way line or as provided in LUC 2.8.3.5.F. 7) 7) A five (5) foot screen is required along the development side of the street landscape border along both sides of Herbert Avenue and a thirty-inch high screen is required along the development side of the street landscape border along 4th Avenue and 6th Street (LUC 3.7.3.2 and Table 3.7.2-I). 8) The following calculation must be added to the landscape plan: square footage of landscape areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage (2-07.2.2.A.2.g). 9) Identify the location, size, and name of all existing vegetation to remain in place.DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e 10) The refuse storage enclosure must be designed to meet the screening requirements of LUC Table 3.7.2-I. The opening must be screened with a solid 6' high gate. 11) The plan may require revision based on Native Plant Preservation requirements, see NPPO comments. DS 2-15.3.4.B 12) Uses such as parking and patios may not be located within the area reserved for the street landscape borders. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 13) Parked cars or other obstructions may not be located in sight visibility triangles as described in DS 3-01.5.1. Revise the site and landscape plans to show all visibility triangles and relocated any uses or structures inconsistent with the standard. |
| 08/12/2003 | DAN CASTRO | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a fully dimensioned disabled parking space detail, which includes the slope of the ramp, direction of slope, width of sidewalk, and access aisle dimensions. (ANSI A117.1-1998 Sections 405 and 502) 2. Per IBC Table 1106.1, three (3) accessible spaces are required based on the 71 vehicle parking spaces provided. One (1) of the three (3) accessible spaces must be van accessible. |
| 08/12/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next Submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Note the existing and proposed building heights of all existing and proposed buildings and structures. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6) 2. The correct number of vehicle parking spaces required based on 6,793 SF. is 136 spaces. Please revise the number of spaces required and the number required for the variance. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8) 3. Provide a fully dimensioned disabled parking space detail, which includes the slope of the ramp, direction of slope, width of sidewalk, and access aisle dimensions. (ANSI A117.1-1998 Sections 405 and 502) 4. a) Dimension the back-up spur radii. The spur must have a minimum three (3) foot depth and have a three (3) foot radii. b) If a wall, screen, or other type of obstruction over six (6) inches in height is to be provided along the 5th Avenue street lot line, a minimum distance of three (3) feet must be provided between the back-up spur and wall, screen, or other obstruction. (D.S. 3-05.2.2.D) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8) 5. Dimension the wheelstop location. When wheelstop curbing is used, it is to be located two and one-half (2½) feet from the front of the parking space. (D.S. 3-05.2.2.D) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8) 6. Revise the number of bicycle parking spaces required to three (3). 71 x .04 = 2.86. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9) 7. Provide a fully dimensioned Class II bicycle parking space detail, which includes the type of paving and access aisle dimension. Refer to D.S. 2-09 for design criteria. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9) 8. Will there be any structures above 30 inches in height located within a sight visibility triangle? If so, D.S. 3-01.5.1.A.1 does not permit any structures between 30 inches in height and six (6) feet through a triangular area adjacent to a driveway. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10) 9. How does one enter the building using the pedestrian path from the disabled parking space? The pedestrian path appears to dead end at the open patio. If a rear entrance is provided, please provide an accessible path into the rear entrance. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12) 10. If applicable, provide a detail of existing and/or proposed free-standing signage and outdoor lighting on the site plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25) 11. Per L.U.C. Sec. 3.4.5.3 Commercial Services Us Group, one (1) 12' x 35' loading space is required for this project. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14) 12. Per the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan, 6th Street is designated as a 90 foot right-of-way. The site plan indicates an existing and future 39.6 foot right-of-way which is short of the standard 45' half right-of-way for a 90 foot right-of-way. Please contact the Engineering Section to verify the correct right-of-way. If the right-of-way requires to be widened in the future, all improvements must be in compliance with future right-of-way conditions. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19) 13. Per L.U.C. Sec. 3.3.4, the proposed land use "Alcoholic Beverage Service" requires that all required vehicle parking be located within the same block. As proposed, the westernmost parking lot is located across Herbert Avenue in another block. (LUC 3.3.7.1.A) 14. Please note the proposed land use as follows: Alcoholic Beverage Service, "33", subject to: Sec. 3.5.14.9.C. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31) 15. Per Pima County Assessors Records, the site is comprised of three (3) separate parcels which must be combined by providing a copy of the recorded City of Tucson Lot Combination Covenant and a copy of the approved Pima County Assessors Tax Combination form. A copy of the City of Tucson Lot Combination Covenant is attached to the yellow site plan card. 16. If a Board of Adjustment Variance is applied for, please note the case number date of approval, variances granted, and any conditions imposed on the site plan. 17. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. (D.S. 2-07.2.1.A) 18. Per IBC Table 1106.1, three (3) accessible spaces are required based on the 71 vehicle parking spaces provided. One (1) of the three (3) accessible spaces must be van accessible. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 08/20/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | All development is subject to Native Plant Preservation regulations. Submit a Native Plant Preservation plan or application for exception. LUC 3.8 PLANS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR ADDITIONAL REVIEW WITHOUT THE REQUIRED NPPO SUBMITTAL. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/20/2003 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/20/2003 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |