Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T03CM03375
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/08/2004 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | A copy of the stamped approved Development Plan must be included in the submittal. |
| 01/13/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise floor drains FD-1 and FD-2, floor sink FS-1, and their trap arms as required to comply with Section 1003.3 and Table 10-1, UPC 1994 with AZ State amendments. 2. Coordinate the locations of the rooftop equipment and roof drains with the architectural and mechanical drawings. The equipment locations do not agree with the mechanical drawings and the roof drain and overflow located near H.1- 3 on Sheet A-3.0 is approximately 18 feet from the corresponding roof drain shown on Sheet P-10. Revise gas, roof drain, and condensate piping as required. Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code 1997. 3. Show upper terminal wall cleanout for room 126 on waste and vent riser diagram. 4. Coordinate waste and vent riser diagram with the plumbing floor plan for room 111. 5. Appliances to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps may require reduced pressure principle backflow preventers. Please submit equipment sheets for determination. Reference Section 603.0, UPC 1994. |
| 01/13/2004 | Robert Sherry | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Show the smoke detectors in the return air ducts of all air distribution systems with a capacity greater than 2,000 CFM (AC-1 through AC-7), upstream of any outside air connections. Reference Section 606.1, IMC. 2. Provide signatures for compliance sections of energy code compliance calculations. Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code 1997. 3. Provide Listing information of the Type I hoods (1 - 7) to show that the exhaust volumes shown on the drawings are adequate for the intended applications. Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code 1997. 4. Coordinate the revised hood information for K-93 (only one hood) with the equipment schedule shown on sheet M-1. 5. Coordinate airflow quantities for each terminal duct connection of AC-8 (Pre-conditioning) with scheduled airflow for AC-8. The unit is scheduled for 8800 CFM on M-1 but a total of 8990 CFM is shown on M-3. Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code 1997. 6. Coordinate scheduled airflow capacity of AC-5 with the airflow quantities shown on the drawing. The unit is scheduled for 5000 CFM on M-1 but a total of only 3700 CFM is shown on M-3. Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code 1997. 7. Provide listing information for EF-3. Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code 1997. 8. Revise Note 1, shown on sheet M-2, to comply with Section 506.3.13.1, IMC 2000. Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code 1997. 9. Coordinate the locations of the rooftop equipment with the architectural and structural drawings. Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code 1997. 10. Show how the hoods are to be supported. Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code 1997. |
| 01/13/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/14/2004 | Martin Haeberle | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Structural plans indicate design per UBC. Plans to be designed to the 2000 IBC. Revise plans. Must include calculations as well. 2. Additional mechanical equipment has been added to roof. Revise structural calculations to justify proposed beam and joist sizes supporting additional loads. |
| 01/23/2004 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/28/2004 | Linda Buczynski | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. Sheet E-2 1. Please specify sizing for the GEC and MJB. This comment was made on the first submittal. Note that per NEC 250-102 (c , where the service entrance conductors exceed 1100 kcmil copper, that bonding jumper shall have an area not less that 12 1½ of the largest phase conductor. (4) (600) (0.125) = 300. MBJ shall be 300 kcmil, not 3/0, which per Table 8 is only 167.8 kcmil. 2. Note 2 calls for CBs at the MSB to be rated 100,000 A.I.C. On the SLD the CBs are 65,000. Please clarify. 3. Comments from first review called for the fault current to be shown at all critical points of the system. Please do so. For example, DMA and DMB appear to have fault currents exceeding 14,000A. Same for K70 and K71. K34 appears to have AFC . 10,000A. Other pieces of equipment, such as REF1and AC6, appear to have AFC . 5,000A. Please demonstrate, on the plans, that such equipment will not be subject to fault current beyond their ratings. Sheet E-3 1. Keynote 2 refers to Sheet E-10. There is no such Sheet. Sheet E-4 1. K56 listed as 5 KW on Kitchen Equipment Schedule, but 600VA on E-26. Please clarify. 2. Changes have been made to the sealed drawings, using the Revision Triangle and cloud, but without documentation in the right column title block area. Please provide such proper documentation, as was done on Sheet E-1, for all sheets subject to revision. This is a global comment, applying to all sheets as necessary. 3. North arrow orientation does not conform to that of Sheets A1.0 or ST.1. Please coordinate among disciplines. Sheet E-5 1. EF-3 at 2 HP 208 V motor 24.2A per NEC Table 430-150. (24.2) (1.25) = 30.25. Please size the fuse at 30 A for overload protection or justify otherwise. |
| 01/29/2004 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | Needs to show location/method of connection to sewer. |
| 01/30/2004 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning 1/30/2004 The building plans may not be reviewed and approved until the approved development and landscape plans are included in each set of the building plans. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/05/2004 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/02/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |