Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T03CM03192
Parcel: 140420460

Address:
6608 S TUCSON BL

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T03CM03192
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/22/2003 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Denied 1. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT ON SITE PLAN.
2. UNDERGROUND FIRE SERVICE LINE INCORRECT. SUBMIT APPROVED COT WATER PLAN.
08/11/2003 Doug Williams ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Turbulence Bar and Lounge
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 12 August 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T03CM03192/T03BU01853
T13S, R14E, Sec.17

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the site plan, grading plan, drainage report and stormwater pollution prevention plans received on July 23, 2003. Approvals are not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

1. Depict existing and future sight visibility triangles per Development Standard (DS) 2-02.2.1.10;
2. Provide dimensioning for the loading space maneuvering area on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.14);
3. Provide estimated cut and fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1.17);
4. Depict and dimension existing and future (Major Streets and Routes) rights of way (DS 2-02.2.1.19);
5. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines (DS 2-02.2.1.21);
6. * Depict and label solid waste vehicle maneuverability area and turning radii, fully dimensioned. Depict and label minimum 18' curb return radii at all locations where parking area access lanes (paal's) intersects another paal, where the solid waste and loading vehicles must maneuver (DS 2-02.2.1.32, 6-01.0 and 3-01.10, Figure 6); * It appears there is insufficient room for the vehicle to exit after picking up refuse - see figure 1, DS 6-01.10);
7. Depict roof drainage direction and scuppers for conveyance under sidewalk areas for conveyance of 10-year flows at a minimum (DS 2-08.5.1 E);
8. Demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, per City of Tucson Land Use Code, Section3.7.4, and the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM), Section 14.2.10 (DS 10-02.0). Please provide finish grades, typical cross-sections or notes demonstrating water harvesting in the landscape areas.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.


Doug Williams
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
08/13/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS SANITATION REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Turbulence Bar and Lounge
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 12 August 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM03192
T13S, R14E, Sec.17

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the site plan, grading plan, drainage report and stormwater pollution prevention plans received on July 23, 2003. Approvals are not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

1. Depict existing and future sight visibility triangles per Development Standard (DS) 2-02.2.1.10;
2. Provide dimensioning for the loading space maneuvering area on the site plan (DS) 2-02.2.1.14;
3. Provide estimated cut and fill quantities (DS) 2-02.2.1.17;
4. Depict and dimension existing and future (Major Streets and Routes) rights of way (DS) 2-02.2.1.19;
5. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines (DS) 2-02.2.1.21;
6. * Depict and label solid waste vehicle maneuverability area and turning radii, fully dimensioned. Depict and label minimum 18' curb return radii at all locations where parking area access lanes (paal's) intersect another paal, where the solid waste and loading vehicles must maneuver (DS) 2-02.2.1.32, 6-01.0 and 3-01.10, Figure 6); * It appears there is insufficient room for the vehicle to exit after picking up refuse - see figure 1, DS 6-01.10;
7. Demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, per City of Tucson Land Use Code, Section3.7.4, and the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM), Section 14.2.10 (DS 10-02.0). Please provide finish grades, typical cross-sections or notes demonstrating water harvesting in the landscape areas.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Doug Williams
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
08/14/2003 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL

TO: Metro Permit Express
1001 N. Alvernon Way #105
Tucson, AZ 85718
(520) 977-7187

FROM: Peter McLaughlin
SR Planner
Development Services Dept

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner
Development Services Dept.

PROJECT:
T02CM03192
Club Turbulence
46610 S. Tucson Blvd
Site Plan Review (1st review)

TRANSMITTAL: August 14, 2003


COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.


1. This project was reviewed for full code compliance.
DS 2-02

2. It does appear that the zoning boundary between the P-I and I-1 zones is depicted in its correct location on the plan. City zoning maps indicate that the zoining boundary crosses the south lot line at a point 385.73 feet west of the mid-section line of Sec 17, T. 15 S, R 14 E, and 297.27 feet east of the parcel's west lot line. They also indicate that it trends north from the north lot line of the site at a point 394.46 feet west of the mid-section line and 289.54 feet east of the west lot line. Because the site has split zoning, please clarify by adding the mid-section line to the plan in its correct location, and by dimensioning the zoning boundaries from the mid-section line and from the west lot line. Note: The proposed entertainment use is not allowed in the P-I zone.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.28
LUC 2.7.1

3. Dimension the wheelstop curbs from the front of parking spaces per DS 3-05.2.3.C.2. Wheelstop curbing is to be located 2-½ feet from the front of parking spaces.
DS 3-05.2.3.C

4. Add the development designator for the proposed parking use in the P-I zone, which is "33" to the project data notes. Also, add the restrictions which the proposed entertainment use is subject to: The entertainment use in the I-1 zone is subject to LUC 3.5.4.4.A, .B., .C and .D and LUC 3.5.4.19.C which prohibits large bars and dance halls.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.31
LUC 2.7.1.2.B.7
LUC 2.7.2.2.C.10

5. Provide loading zone calcs based on the proposed commercial service / entertainment use and the square footage of the proposed building per LUC 3.4.5, stating the number of loading spaces required and provided.
DS 2-02.2.2.A.5
DS 2-02.2.1.A.14

6. Based on the proposed entertainment use, bicycle parking is required at 8 percent of the vehicle parking spaces provided, all class 2. Any time class 2 bicycle parking is required, class may be substituted on a space-by-space basis, provided the class 2 parking is not reduced more than 50 percent. Provide a bicycle parking calculation detailing how many class 1 and class 2 bicycle spaces are required and provided. Revise bicycle parking detail and keynote 1 on sheet A1.3 to indicate that at least 50 percent of the spaces provided are class 2.
LUC 3.3.7.8.B
LUC 3.3.4
DS 2-02.2.1.A.9

7. Because bicycle parking is proposed to be located on the opposite side of the building from the public right-of-way, project entry and directional signage shall be provided to direct bicyclists to the bicycle parking facility. Show the location of the directional signage on the site plan.
DS 2-09.5.1

8. Please place the recordation information concerning all easements, including docket and page reference numbers for the existing 5-foot electrical and water easements. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20

9. Correct the Airport Hazard District Note to indicate that the elevation above median sea level (MSL) of the NE end of runway 21 is 2,576 feet. Correct the following notes to indicate the max height of the proposed building is not to exceed 2,626 feet (50 feet above the elevation of the northeast end of runway 21) above MSL. As the elevation of the building pad is stated to be 2,584 feet on the site plan contour, the building may be no taller than 42 feet above the grade elevation (not above MSL). LUC 2.8.5.7.A.1

10. Add a parking calculation to the site plan detailing the number of vehicle parking spaces required and provided per LUC 3.3.4. Also, provide a handicapped parking calculation of handicapped vehicle parking required and provided per IBC.
DS 2-02.2.2.4
LUC 3.3.4
IBC

11. Provide the maximum slope of the handicapped ramps and aisles to be provided.
ANSI/IBC

12. Specify in the site data and code check notes that the MS&R street perimeter yard setback is the greater of 21 feet or height measured from the back of future curb location
LUC 3.2.6.5

13. Provide a copy of recorded cross-access and parking agreement with the adjacent lot to the north. Add docket and page information to the site plan for the agreement

14. Please dimension clearly all MS&R street monument lines for Tucson Blvd, including centerline, existing and future curbs, existing and future rights-of-way, existing and future sidewalks, and if applicable, a street widening site plan drawing. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19 and .21

15. Please provide the complete legal description of the property to the site plan. The project site is actually a portion of the legal description provided, per lot split case number LS 03-75., approved 6/26/03. DS 2-02.2.1.A.2

16. Add future and existing site visibility triangles (SVTs) to the access drive entrance along Tucson Blvd. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10
DS 3-03.2.2.C
DS 3-01.5

17. Show the location, size and height of any proposed freestanding signage. Also, indicate if any billboards exist on the site. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13

18. Provide a floor area ratio (FAR) calculation to the plan. The proposed FAR is calculated as the building gross floor area ÷ site area. In this case, the FAR would be calculated as 6,598 sq ft floor area ÷ 110,115.88 sq. ft. site area = 0.06. As stated in the site data and code check notes, the max allowed FAR per development designator 34 is 2.00.v DS 2-02.2.2.A

19. Dimension the width of the entrance drive from Tucson Blvd. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11

20. The pedestrian refuge areas and access routes (keynote 3 on sheet A1.3) which provide connection to Tucson Blvd must be made of concrete and be physically separated from adjacent PAALs/vehicle use area by use of raised concrete curbing except at the points where it crosses the PAAL. Please revise pedestrian sidewalks to show physical separation. Please revise drawing/ keynote 3. DS 2-08.4.1
DS 2-02.2.1.A.12

21. The proposed planter islands appear to reduce the length of these vehicle parking spaces to less than the minimum requirement of 15 ½ feet in length (plus 2 ½ feet for overhang). The islands extend into the parking spaces more than 3 ½ feet on each side. Please revise. As it appears there is a surplus of parking provided, these spaces may be deleted from the provided parking calculation in order to provide larger planter islands. They man not, however, be counted towards meeting the required parking. LUC 3.3.7.2

22. For reference please provide a project location map on site plan sheet A1.1.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.4

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608.
08/14/2003 PETER MCLAUGHLIN HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied See zoning review comments.
08/20/2003 Joseph Linville LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied Revise the plans as requested by the Zoning Reviewer regarding the tree planters located in the parking areas. Refer to DS 2-06 Figure 5 for applicable standards.

This project is subject to the Native Plant Preservation regulations. Refer to LUC 3.8. Revisions to the landscape plan may be required.
08/20/2003 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit a Native Plant Preservation plan. LUC 3.8, DS 2-15.0

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/27/2003 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
08/27/2003 TAMI ACHONG REJECT SHELF Completed