Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T03CM03116
Parcel: 134190830

Address:
75 S MONTEGO DR

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T03CM03116
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/01/2003 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
07/21/2003 Loren Makus SANITATION REVIEW Denied DATE: July 22, 2003
TO: Ms. Valerie Hudson, Hudson Design
SUBJECT: Handi-Dogs Facility Site Plan Review
REVIEWER: Loren Makus
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM03116

SUMMARY: The Site Plan was reviewed by Development Services Department, Engineering Division. The site plan was not approved at this time. Please address the following comments.

Site Plan Comments:
1) Call out a description of the proposed structure that is parallel to the alley along the east side of the property and north of the proposed building. Clarify whether this is a curb or a screen wall. Per City of Tucson Development Standard (DS) 3-05.2.2.D, if this is a wall, the backup spur must have a three-foot shy space between the curb and wall.
2) Provide estimated cut and fill quantities. (DS 2-02.1.A.17)
3) Provide sight visibility triangles for each driveway location. (DS 2-02.1.A.10)
4) Provide line of sight distances per DS 3-01.53 for MS&R Arterial Street Kolb Road for existing and future sight visibility triangles. (DS 2-02.1.A.10)
5) Show roof drainage patterns. Provide sidewalk scuppers at each downspout location and indicate that all flows up to a 10-year event will be conveyed under sidewalks. (DS 2-02.1.A.16 and DS 2-08.5.1.E)
6) Revise the trash enclosure detail to provide steel pipes along the sides as well as along the rear of the enclosure. (DS 6-01.4.2.C.2)

Revise the site plan to address all of these comments and resubmit two copies for review. Include a letter explaining how each comment has been addressed.


Loren Makus
Senior Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services
07/21/2003 Loren Makus ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: July 22, 2003
TO: Ms. Valerie Hudson, Hudson Design
SUBJECT: Handi-Dogs Facility Site Plan Review
REVIEWER: Loren Makus
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM03116

SUMMARY: The Site Plan was reviewed by Development Services Department, Engineering Division. The site plan was not approved at this time. Please address the following comments.

Site Plan Comments:
1) Call out a description of the proposed structure that is parallel to the alley along the east side of the property and north of the proposed building. Clarify whether this is a curb or a screen wall. Per City of Tucson Development Standard (DS) 3-05.2.2.D, if this is a wall, the backup spur must have a three-foot shy space between the curb and wall.
2) Provide estimated cut and fill quantities. (DS 2-02.1.A.17)
3) Provide sight visibility triangles for each driveway location. (DS 2-02.1.A.10)
4) Provide line of sight distances per DS 3-01.53 for MS&R Arterial Street Kolb Road for existing and future sight visibility triangles. (DS 2-02.1.A.10)
5) Show roof drainage patterns. Provide sidewalk scuppers at each downspout location and indicate that all flows up to a 10-year event will be conveyed under sidewalks. (DS 2-02.1.A.16 and DS 2-08.5.1.E)
6) Revise the trash enclosure detail to provide steel pipes along the sides as well as along the rear of the enclosure. (DS 6-01.4.2.C.2)

Revise the site plan to address all of these comments and resubmit two copies for review. Include a letter explaining how each comment has been addressed.


Loren Makus
Senior Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services
07/28/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) A street landscape border is required along the entire Montego Street frontage. The border must be a minimum of ten feet wide at all points. LUC 3.7.2.4.A

2) Identify all proposed screening elements on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.A.3

3) A thirty inch high screen is required along Montego Drive on the development side of the street landscape border. LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Refer to LUC 3.7.3.2.C for location requirements and LUC 3.7.3.7 for material standards.

4) Where the parking area is located adjacent to the wall proposed along the south property line a barrier is required to prevent vehicular contact . Refer to DS 3-05.2.3.C

5) A barrier is required for the tree planter within the parking area. LUC 3.7.2.3.B

6) Provide verification of City Engineer approval, in writing, regarding placement of landscaping within the public right of way. Dimension the Montego Drive street landscape border.

7) In the Notes column on sheet L1 the word "future" appears. Be advised that LUC 3.7.7.4.A provides that "All landscaping required by this Division will be inspected by the Development Services Department (DSD) prior to a final certificate of occupancy being issued by the City". Any required landscaping must be installed prior to occupancy.

8) A summary of the native plant preservation requirements
must appear on the landscape plan. DS 2-15.3.4.B
07/29/2003 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied Based on the information provided on the landscape plan it appears that protected native plants may be present on the site. A native plant preservation plan is required per LUC 3.8, DS 2-15.0.
07/30/2003 Peter McLaughlin ZONING REVIEW Denied SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL

TO: Hudson Design/ Valerie Hudson
439 N. 6th Avenue FROM:
Tucson, AZ 85705
(520) 624-5115

FROM: Peter McLaughlin
Development Services Dept.

FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner
Development Services Dept.
PROJECT:
T03CM03116
Handi-Dogs, Inc.
75 S. Montego Drive
Site Plan Review (1st review)

TRANSMITTAL: July 30, 2003

COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This project is being reviewed for full code compliance.
DS 2-02
2. The required bldg. setback from the east and south lot lines (with adjacent residential zonings) is 1-½ times the building height. With a 16' height to top of parapet along the south building wall, a 24' bldg. setback is required. With an 18'-2" height to top of parapet along east bldg. wall, a 27'-3" bldg. setback is required. Please revise plan. An LDO will be required for the east and south lot lines if building setbacks are not met. If a Lot Development Option (LDO) is applied for, please list as a general note the following: case number; date of approval, and conditions imposed if any. In addition, provide a copy of the LDO approval letter to the Zoning Review Section upon resubmittal. If a Borad of Adjustment variance is sought for the loading zone requirement (see comment 12 below), the setback issue may be addressed as part of the variance procedure.
LUC 3.2.6.4
DS 2-05.2.2.B.6

3. Dimension from street monument lines the distance to existing curbs.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.21

4. The correct development designator is "28". Please revise.
LUC 2.5.3.2.A.2

5. The animal service use in the C-1 zone is subject to LUC 3.5.4.1.A, .B, .C, and .D. Please revise note to correctly detail these restrictions.
LUC 2.5.3.2.A.2

6. State the existing use on the site plan (i.e. vacant).
DS 2-02.2.1.A.31

7. In the bicycle parking calculation add a statement that zero spaces are provided.
DS 2-02.2.2.A.5

8. Revise street building setbacks to indicate that the required street perimeter yard building setback is the greater of 21 feet or the height of proposed exterior building wall measured from the back of existing curb location.
LUC 3.2.6.5

9. Dimension the depth of the back up spur at the east end of the parking lot. It must be a minimum of 3 feet in depth. In addition, when there is a wall, fence or other obstruction over 6 inches in height along the east property line, adjacent to the parking lot, there must be a minimum distance of three feet provided between the back of the spur and the obstruction. If a 5' CMU wall is proposed here, please label it with keynote 9.
DS 3-05.2.2.D

10. Structures, including walls may not be constructed within easements. Please revise site plan. Also, add the purpose of the easement and the recordation information (docket and page) to the drawing. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20

11. Provide the maximum slope of the handicap ramps and aisles. ANS/ IBC

12. Provide a loading zone calculation stating that one 12' × 35' loading is required. There is no loading zone shown on the site plan. Please revise drawing. If no loading zone is to be provided, a Board of Adjustment variance application must be approved. If a variance is applied for and approved, please list as a general note the following: variance case number; date of approval, and conditions imposed if any. In addition, provide a copy of the variance approval document to the Zoning Review Section upon resubmittal. DS 2-02.2.2.A.5
DS 2-05.2.2.B.6

13. Add sight visibility triangles to the ingress-egress points along Montego Drive. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10

14. Revise legal description to be complete and correct. The correct legal description according to the Assessor's records is Desert Dells Addition Resub, S. 164.82' Lot 2 & S. 51.82' Lot 3, Bk 28, Pg 56. DS 2-02.1.A.2

15. Dimension the width of the standard parking spaces. DS 2-02.2.1.A.8

16. The dimensions in the trash enclosure detail are not centered correctly. Please revise.

17. With a 4,804 square-foot building proposed only 12 parking spaces are required for the proposed animal service use. (4804 sf ÷ 400 sf = 12.01). Revise parking calculations accordingly. DS 2-02.2.2.A.4
LUC 3.3.4

18. If any free-standing outdoor lighting or signage is proposed for this site, please detail on the site plan.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 & 25

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.
07/30/2003 PETER MCLAUGHLIN HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied See site plan review comments.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/04/2003 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
07/31/2003 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed