Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL
Permit Number - T03CM02424
Review Name: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/23/2003 | WILDAN | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: Sheet A8.2 1. NER-200 could not be identified as a current listing with the ICBO. Please clarify. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS: 1. The second review comment letter related that first review structural response comments such as, "See revised structural drawings and calculations" are rather vague and that written responses to review comments should contain more text detail and bolstered with notations having specificity such as, detail number, calculation page and structural design methodology, etc. Please clarify structural responses for completion of back check. 2. The revised structural calculations do not have an index to find floor beam designs, bearing wall designs, shear wall designs, building design criteria, material specifications, compilation of wind loads, compilation of seismic Sds, Sd1; etc. The calculations also do not contain key plans and elevations showing design member marks coordinated with member calculation designs. Please provide coordinated calculations. 3. Details at the support of bottom bearing floor trusses shall be enhanced to show complete structural blocking details, shear wall details, and fire rated membrane details. (Suggest that architect may wish to consider top chord bearing trusses with extended bottom chords short of the fire rated membrane.) 4. All Special Inspections to be performed for the soils, foundations, and structural frame shall be listed on the structural engineer's drawing S4.0 in accordance with IBC 1704 under a heading entitled, Special Inspections, and be in agreement with the listing provided and attached to the Special Inspection Agreement. Please coordinate. 5. The requirements for deferred design submittals for wood trusses shall be identified on the structural engineer's drawing S4.0 with specific requirements for the truss engineer to provide sealed calculations and sealed drawings that are in agreement with IBC Sections 106.3.4.2 and 1704, and contain all of the required data identified in IBC Section 2303.4.1. The deferred design submittal documents shall be submitted to the building official for approval after the design professional in responsible charge has marked them with a notation indicating that the deferred submittal documents have been reviewed and that they have been found to be in general conformance with the design of the building. The deferred design submittal items shall not be installed until their design and submittal documents have been approved by the building official. 6. The lateral calculations for the Gatehouse are not sealed by the engineer. Please provide sealed calculations. 7. The Fv and Fa values shown on Drawing S2.2A and others are incorrect. See Item 2 above. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS: 1. The proposed accent electric floodlights angled upward are not compliant with the Outdoor Lighting Code. Please review and clarify. |
| 07/25/2003 | EROSE1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 07/25/2003 | EROSE1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 07/25/2003 | ELAINE ROSE | ZONING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 07/25/2003 | EROSE1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 07/25/2003 | EROSE1 | WATER | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/25/2003 | ELAINE ROSE | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |