Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T03CM02275
Parcel: 141012380

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: OTHER

Permit Number - T03CM02275
Review Name: OTHER
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/12/2003 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
05/29/2003 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Passed
06/02/2003 DAVE WITT BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL REVIEW Denied PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - PROJECT #T03CM02275

6/2/03 10541 E. ELEANOR MALDONADO PLACE

PLAN REVIEW FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED STRUCTURE HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THIS LETTER REFLECTS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A SHORTER BACK CHECK TIME, WE REQUEST THAT YOU PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS, HIGHLIGHTING ANY CHANGES, ALONG WITH A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE NOTED ITEMS INDICATING ACTION TAKEN.

SCOPE OF REVIEW:

THE SCOPE OF THIS PLAN REVIEW COVERS ARCHITECTURAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, MODEL ENERGY AND ELECTRICAL CODES. ALL CODE REFERENCES ARE TO THE 2000 IRC AND STATE PLUMBING CODE. ALL FEATURES WERE CHECKED ONLY TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE SUBMITTALS PROVIDED. ALL PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT ARE ASSUMED TO MEET OR WILL MEET OTHER DEPARTMENTAL REQUIREMENTS, CONDITIONS AND CONCERNS BEFORE PERMIT APPROVAL.

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:

1. ALL PLANS SHALL BE LEGIBLE AND A SCALE NO SMALLER THAN ΒΌ INCH = 1-FOOT SHALL BE USED
FOR ALL FLOOR PLANS, FRAMING PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. DETAILS &CROSS SECTIONS AT A MINIMUM 3/8 INCH = 1-FOOT SCALE.
2. ALL CORRECTIONS AND REVISIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AND TWO NEW SETS OF PRINTS OR (1) SEPIA & (1) BLUE LINE SHALL BE RETURNED ALONG WITH ALL REDLINE PRINTS.

3. PEN OR PENCIL CORRECTIONS ON FINAL PRINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. TO AVOID DELAYS ENSURE ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, ARE COMPLETE AND HAVE BEEN COORDINATED ON ALL APPLICABLE DETAILS AND NOTES.

4. LIST THE SQUARE FOOTAGES FOR ALL THE FOLLOWING AREAS SEPARATELY ON THE DRAWINGS:
- LIVABLE AREA
- GARAGE
- PORCH/PATIO COVERS
- DECKS

5. ALL ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS INVOLVED IN THE DESIGN OF THE STRUCTURE ARE TO SEAL THE
RELATED SHEETS OF PLANS, DETAILS AND CALCULATIONS. THIS IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF
THE STATE BOARD OF TECHNICAL REGISTRATION.

SITE PLAN:

1. HOW DOES THE WALLED A/C CONDENSING UNIT'S ACCESS COMPLY WITH M1305.2

FLOOR PLANS:

1. ONE OF THE 2660s IS LESS THAN 2 FEET FROM THE DOOR TO THE PATIO; HOW DOES IT COMPLY WITH R308.4 ITEM 5 ?

2. THE 2630 IN THE MASTER BATH IS IN THE WALL OF THE TUB ENCLOSURE; HOW DOES IT COMPLY WITH R308.4 ITEM 4 ?

STRUCTURAL PLANS:

1. THE BRACED WALL PANEL (SHEARWALL) IS LESS THAN 2'-8" WIDE . IS THIS SHEARWALL NEEDED ?

2. THE SHEAR WALL IN THE S.E. CORNER OF THE L/R , THE FIREPLACE WALL, APPEARS TO BE LESS THAN 2'-8" WIDE; HOW DOES IT COMPLY WITH R602..10.6 ?

3. THE OTHER SHEARWALL IN THE S.E. CORNER OF THE L/R LABELED AS SHEARWALL 2 APPEARS TO BE LESS THAN 4'-0" WIDE; HOW DOES IT COMPLY WITH R602.10.3 ?

4. THE SHEARWALL BETWEEN THE WINDOWS TO THE PLAYROOM AND BEDROOM #2 IS LESS THAN 4'-0" WIDE; HOW DOES IT CONFORM TO R602.10.3 ?

5. THE SHEARWALL AT THE S.W. CORNER OF BEDROOM #2IS LESS THAN 2'-8" WIDE; HOW DOES IT COMPLY WITH R602..10.6 ? IS IT REQUIRED ?

6. THE SHEARWALL AT THE NORTH END OF THE WEST WALL OF THE MEDITATION ROOM APPEARS TO BO LESS THAN 2'-8" WIDE ? HOW DOES IT COMPLY WITH R602.10.6 ?

7. FRAMING PLAN, DESCRIBE THE FRONT PORCH RAFTERS.

8. FRAMING PLAN, JUSTIFY THE 2-2X8 HEADER OVER THE2/8 POCKET DOOR BETWEEN THE PLAYROOM AND BEDROOM #3.

9. FRAMING PLAN, JUSTIFY THE 2-2X8 HEADER AT THE 5 FOOT SPAN OVER THE HALL/DINING JUNCTURE.

10. FRAMING PLAN, JUSTIFY THE 2-2X10 HEADER OVER THE WATER HEATER ROOM.

ELEVATIONS:

1. NOTE GLASS IN HAZARDOUS AREAS SHALL BE SAFETY GLASS PER R308.4.

SECTIONS - DETAILS - MISC. NOTES:

1. 3 &4 / S.4 , JUSTIFY THE STUDS NOT HAVING FULL BEARING ON THE BEAM (ROTATION) .

2. 1 & 2 / S.4, PLEASE ILLUSTRATE THE FIREBLOCKS AT THE CEILING LINE.

3. 12 /S.4, PROVIDE A RAFTER/PLATE CONNECTION.

4. 9/S.4 , PROVIDE A RAFTER/BEAM CONNECTION.

5. 1 & 3 / S.4 , IDENTIFY THE JOIST HANGER.

6. 6 / S.3 ; SIMPSON LCB'S ARE TO BE SET FLUSH WITH THE CONCRETE WITHOUT THE 1" STAND OFF. HOW DOES IT COMPLY WITH R323 ITEM #6 ?

7. 8 / S.3 , HOW DOES THE FOOTING WIDTH COMPLY WITH R403.1.1 ?

8. THE ROOF PLAN DETAILS REFER TO SHEET A.5 . SHOULD THIS REFERENCE BE TO DETAILS ON SHEET S.4 ?

PLUMBING PLANS:

1. NOTES AND SPECS SHOULD REFER TO THE '94 U.P.C. AS AMENDED INSTEAD OF THE I.R.C.

ELECTRICAL PLANS:

1. PLEASE NOTE THE LIGHTS OVER THE TUB AND SHOWER ARE TO BE LISTED FOR USE IN WET AREAS

2. PLEASE NOTE THE CLOSET LIGHT IS TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORD WITH E3903.11

3. HOW DO THE RECEPTACLES ON THE KITCHEN ISLAND COMPLY WITH R3801.4.5 (EXCEPTION) . HOW MUCH DOES THE COUNTER TOP OVER HANG THE RECEPTACLES ?

4. RECEPTACLE OUTLETS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT EACH KITCHEN COUNTER SPACE WIDER THAN 12", AND
SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT NO POINT ALONG THE WALL LINE IS MORE THAN 24" FROM A RECEPTACLE
OUTLET, PER E3801.4.1 . A RECEPTACLE IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE KITCHEN SINK AND THE CORNER OF THE WALLS.

5. THE BATHROOM RECEPTACLES ARE REQUIRED TO BE ON A DEDICATED CIRCUIT. SEE E3603.4 .


IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ASSIGNED PLANS EXAMINER:
DAVE WITT @ 791-5550 EXT. 1110
06/05/2003 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied See comments on card.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/12/2003 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/05/2003 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed