Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-REVISION/OTHER
Permit Number - T03CM02226
Review Name: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-REVISION/OTHER
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/14/2003 | WILDAN | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | October 13, 2003 KDRA 7400 E. McDonald Drive, Suite 101 Scottsdale, AZ 85250 RE: OLD SPANISH TRAIL CROSSING PAD 2, REVISION CITY OF TUCSON LOG NO. T03CM02226-R WILLDAN PROJECT NO. 09058-3301 The initial review for the above project has been completed. This letter reflects comments which need to be addressed by a written response to each, indicating action taken. In order to facilitate a shorter back-check time, we request that you please provide two (2) sets revised plans and calculations, highlighting any changes with appropriate revision number, revision date and "cloud bubbles." Please return redline drawings with your resubmittal. Occupancy Occup. Load Construction Area S.F. Sprinklered Alarms M (Shell) N/A V-B, A.S. 14,959 Yes Yes GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This project has been reviewed for conformance with the 2000 IBC, 1997 UAC, 2000 IMC, 1998 IECC, 1999 NEC codes with local modifications, and the 1994 UPC with State of Arizona Amendments. Any revisions to this plan will require an additional review and approval by Willdan. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: 1. Suspended ceilings for a one story mercantile building in seismic design category C may be installed in accordance with ASTM C635 and C636 provided seismic industry loading is not exceeded. CISCA-02 guidelines recommend float ceiling installation without lateral supports when the ceiling weight not more than 2.5 psf. If ceiling weight is greater than 2.5 psf, then CISCA-02 recommends installation per CISC-3-4. Please review and clarify design ceiling weight as installed. Reference IBC Sections 803.8 and 1621.2.5.2.1, and ASTM C636. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS: 1. The proposed revision for the suspended ceiling installation shall be reviewed, clarified, and approved by the structural engineer for the building design prior to resubmittal for permit approval. General Structural Notes on drawing S1 cautions "do not suspend ceiling from 2x4 joists, suspend with diagonal wires from 4x members." However, the roof structure is a panelized roof system with 2x6 wood joists spanning 8 feet between roof trusses. The trusses are a deferred design submittal and they have not been approved for construction. Suspended ceilings are required to be supported on a 4-foot x 4-foot suspension grid. It is not clear which structural roof members the structural engineer intends for the support of not only the suspended ceiling, but also mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and sprinkler system loads. Please review, clarify, and coordinate with architect and other design disciplines. Reference IBC Sections 1606.1, 1606.2, 1604.4, 1621.2.5, 1621.3.1, 1621.3.9, 1621.3.10.1, and 1621.3.10.2.1 PLUMBING COMMENTS: The plumbing portion was not a part of this review. MECHANICAL COMMENTS: The mechanical portion was not a part of this review. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS: The electrical portion was not a part of this review. ENERGY CODE COMMENTS: The energy code portion was not a part of this review. ACCESSIBILITY COMMENTS: The accessibility portion was not a part of this review. Sincerely, WILLDAN |
| 10/14/2003 | WILDAN | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | AT 3RD PARTY OFFICE | Completed | October 13, 2003 KDRA 7400 E. McDonald Drive, Suite 101 Scottsdale, AZ 85250 RE: OLD SPANISH TRAIL CROSSING PAD 2, REVISION CITY OF TUCSON LOG NO. T03CM02226-R WILLDAN PROJECT NO. 09058-3301 The initial review for the above project has been completed. This letter reflects comments which need to be addressed by a written response to each, indicating action taken. In order to facilitate a shorter back-check time, we request that you please provide two (2) sets revised plans and calculations, highlighting any changes with appropriate revision number, revision date and "cloud bubbles." Please return redline drawings with your resubmittal. Occupancy Occup. Load Construction Area S.F. Sprinklered Alarms M (Shell) N/A V-B, A.S. 14,959 Yes Yes GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This project has been reviewed for conformance with the 2000 IBC, 1997 UAC, 2000 IMC, 1998 IECC, 1999 NEC codes with local modifications, and the 1994 UPC with State of Arizona Amendments. Any revisions to this plan will require an additional review and approval by Willdan. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: 1. Suspended ceilings for a one story mercantile building in seismic design category C may be installed in accordance with ASTM C635 and C636 provided seismic industry loading is not exceeded. CISCA-02 guidelines recommend float ceiling installation without lateral supports when the ceiling weight not more than 2.5 psf. If ceiling weight is greater than 2.5 psf, then CISCA-02 recommends installation per CISC-3-4. Please review and clarify design ceiling weight as installed. Reference IBC Sections 803.8 and 1621.2.5.2.1, and ASTM C636. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS: 1. The proposed revision for the suspended ceiling installation shall be reviewed, clarified, and approved by the structural engineer for the building design prior to resubmittal for permit approval. General Structural Notes on drawing S1 cautions "do not suspend ceiling from 2x4 joists, suspend with diagonal wires from 4x members." However, the roof structure is a panelized roof system with 2x6 wood joists spanning 8 feet between roof trusses. The trusses are a deferred design submittal and they have not been approved for construction. Suspended ceilings are required to be supported on a 4-foot x 4-foot suspension grid. It is not clear which structural roof members the structural engineer intends for the support of not only the suspended ceiling, but also mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and sprinkler system loads. Please review, clarify, and coordinate with architect and other design disciplines. Reference IBC Sections 1606.1, 1606.2, 1604.4, 1621.2.5, 1621.3.1, 1621.3.9, 1621.3.10.1, and 1621.3.10.2.1 PLUMBING COMMENTS: The plumbing portion was not a part of this review. MECHANICAL COMMENTS: The mechanical portion was not a part of this review. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS: The electrical portion was not a part of this review. ENERGY CODE COMMENTS: The energy code portion was not a part of this review. ACCESSIBILITY COMMENTS: The accessibility portion was not a part of this review. Sincerely, WILLDAN |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/14/2003 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |