Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: OTHER
Permit Number - T03CM01961
Review Name: OTHER
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/10/2003 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/09/2003 | DAVE WITT | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - PROJECT #T03CM01961 7/9/03 3633 E. 28TH ST. PLAN REVIEW FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED STRUCTURE HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THIS LETTER REFLECTS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A SHORTER BACK CHECK TIME, WE REQUEST THAT YOU PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS, HIGHLIGHTING ANY CHANGES, ALONG WITH A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE NOTED ITEMS INDICATING ACTION TAKEN. SCOPE OF REVIEW: THE SCOPE OF THIS PLAN REVIEW COVERS ARCHITECTURAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, MODEL ENERGY AND ELECTRICAL CODES. ALL CODE REFERENCES ARE TO THE 2000 IRC AND STATE PLUMBING CODE. ALL FEATURES WERE CHECKED ONLY TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE SUBMITTALS PROVIDED. ALL PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT ARE ASSUMED TO MEET OR WILL MEET OTHER DEPARTMENTAL REQUIREMENTS, CONDITIONS AND CONCERNS BEFORE PERMIT APPROVAL. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. ALL PLANS SHALL BE LEGIBLE AND A SCALE NO SMALLER THAN ΒΌ INCH = 1-FOOT SHALL BE USED FOR ALL FLOOR PLANS, FRAMING PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. DETAILS &CROSS SECTIONS AT A MINIMUM 3/8 INCH = 1-FOOT SCALE. 2. ALL CORRECTIONS AND REVISIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AND TWO NEW SETS OF PRINTS OR (1) SEPIA & (1) BLUE LINE SHALL BE RETURNED ALONG WITH ALL REDLINE PRINTS. 3. PEN OR PENCIL CORRECTIONS ON FINAL PRINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. TO AVOID DELAYS ENSURE ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, ARE COMPLETE AND HAVE BEEN COORDINATED ON ALL APPLICABLE DETAILS AND NOTES. 4. ALL ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS INVOLVED IN THE DESIGN OF THE STRUCTURE ARE TO SEAL THE RELATED SHEETS OF PLANS, DETAILS AND CALCULATIONS. THIS IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF THE STATE BOARD OF TECHNICAL REGISTRATION. FOUNDATION PLANS: 1. DIMENSION THE FOOTING'S MINIMUM THICKNESS . FLOOR PLANS: 1. TWO FLOOR PLANS WERE SUBMITTED. THE L.D.O. IS APPLICABLE TO ONLY ONE. 2. PROVIDE ACCESS TO EACH SEPARATE ATTIC AND CRAWL SPACE THAT EXCEEDS 30SF. DESIGNATE LOCATIONS ON THE DRAWINGS. OPENINGS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 22" BY 30". THE ATTIC ACCESS SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 30" OF HEADROOM, AND SHALL BE LOCATED IN A HALLWAY OR READILY ACCESSIBLE SPACE PER R807. 3. THE WINDOW IN THE SHOWER IS REQUIRED TO BE SAFETY GLASS. STRUCTURAL PLANS: 1. PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S CALCULATIONS AND DATA FOR PRE-FAB TRUSSES. TRUSS CALCULATIONS MUST BE SIGNED, DATED AND WET-SEALED BY AN ENGINEER WHO IS REGISTERED IN ARIZONA. TRUSS CALCULATIONS SHALL BE CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE FLOOR PLANS. ALSO, THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL REVIEW AND "SHOP DRAWING" STAMP APPROVAL ON TRUSS CALCULATIONS. 2. SPECIFY LATERAL SUPPORT OF TRUSSES. 3. DETAIL GABLE END BRACING CONNECTIONS. ELEVATIONS: 1. NOTE GLASS IN HAZARDOUS AREAS ( SHOWER ) SHALL BE SAFETY GLASS PER R308.4. SECTIONS - DETAILS - MISC. NOTES: 1. ON ALL SHEETS, CROSS-OUT ALL DETAILS AND NOTES THAT DO NOT APPLY OR WERE NOT USED. PLUMBING PLANS: 1. PROVIDE A VENT FOR THE SHOWER. 2. SIZE THE VENT FOR THE CLOTHES WASHER. 3. THE GAS ISOMETRIC DOESN'T FIT THE FLOOR PLAN. 4. THE NOTES SHOULD REFER TO THE STATE PLUMBING CODE. ELECTRICAL PLANS: 1. WHERE CEILING FANS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS, PROVIDE A NOTE INDICATING ONLY APPROVED OUTLET BOXES SHALL BE USED, PER E4001.6. MODEL ENERGY CODE: 1. PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS PER THE 1998 IECC, OR COMPLY WITH IRC CHAPTER 11. THESE CALCULATIONS APPEAR TO BE NOT FOR THIS HOUSE. 2. CALL OUT ON THE PLANS THE "R" VALUES OF INSULATION, AS WELL AS THE "U" VALUES OF THE WINDOWS AND DOORS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS PROVIDED. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ASSIGNED PLANS EXAMINER: DAVE WITT @ 791-5550 EXT. 1110 NOTE: AS OF 2-02-01 THE CITY OF TUCSON HAS ADOPTED THE 2000 IRC EXCEPT FOR THE PLUMBING PORTION WHICH IS THE STATE PLUMBING CODE. ALL MODEL PLANS SHALL BE REFERENCE TO THE PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED CODES. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/11/2003 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/11/2003 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |