Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T03CM01832
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/21/2003 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/21/2003 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/21/2003 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/21/2003 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/23/2003 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/09/2003 | MARTIN HAEBERLE | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Rise of stairs may not vary more than .375 inch. Reference section 1003.3.3.3.1 IBC Revise plans 2. Indicate all sleepers and sills on concrete that is in direct contact with earth to be treated wood. Reference section 2304.11.2.3 IBC 3. Provide occupant load calculations of the assembly area including exit widths and location. Note: An increase in the occupant load has occurred with the addition of pews and platform area. 4. The platform is required to be protected by one-fire resistive construction or to be of fire retardant wood if the basement is not used for storage, occupancy, etc... Reference section 410.1 IBC. Revise plans. 5. Proposed steel columns to be protected per Table 601 IBC. Provide details and listed assembly to be use |
| 05/14/2003 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. Add Circuit Dim 9. Indicated on Electric Plan but not on DIM panel schedule. 2. Enter 360VA on Panel N-15. Receptacle on Electrical Plan, but not on panel schedule. 3. Clarify that the series rating on the 2 new circuit breakers at the existing switchboard pertain to the downstream breakers as well as those in the SB itself. 4. Note that there is a 400A feeder protected by a 600 A CB, per our telephne conversation. 5. Clarify how the 9 figure 960 was arrived at in the service load calculation. If this was the starting point instead of the result of applying power factor and the 1.25 multiplier per NEC 220-35, the existing service would be overloaded. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/16/2003 | MONICA VALDEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/14/2003 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |