Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-REVISION/OTHER
Permit Number - T03CM01645
Review Name: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-REVISION/OTHER
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/22/2003 | WILDAN | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: 1. The architectural portion was not part of this review. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS: General 1. A note on the structural deferred design submittal requests the joist manufacturer to confirm joist design loads. Since the submittal requests additional structural analysis, the structural deferred design submittal is not complete. Please provide a complete structural submittal which includes the structural design calculation analysis to show the existing roof's structural elements and the proposed new secondary structural steel supports can or can not safely support the imposed dead loads, 20 psf roof live load and the existing new equipment loads. The combination of loads shall not increase the forces in any structural element (stresses) by more than five percent above the original design or appropriate remediation work shall be designed and installed. The installed weight of motor driven machinery shall be increased 20% for the design of supporting elements. Please review and clarify. Reference IBC Sections 1604.4, 1607.8.2, and 3402.2. 2. Please provide structural analysis for the support of the new kitchen hood and ductwork loads upon the existing structural building floor elements. Reference IBC Sections 1604.4 and 3402.2. 3. The installation of the proposed new structural steel elements requires special inspections. Please provide the City of Tucson's required documentation for required special inspections. Reference IBC Section 1704.3. PLUMBING COMMENTS: 1. The plumbing portion was not part of this review. MECHANICAL: 1. The mechanical portion was not part of this review. ELECTRICAL 1. The electrical portion was not part of this review. ACCESSIBILITY 1. The accessibility portion was not part of this review. MODEL ENERGY 1. The model energy portion was not part of this review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/22/2003 | ELAINE ROSE | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |